And then you can use V=IR to solve for resistance.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Liquidxlax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance of a conductive shell with radii a and b, where the resistance formula is given as R = (a^-1 - b^-1) / (4πσ). Participants address issues with algebra and the interpretation of electric fields between the two shells, emphasizing the need for proper integration to find voltage. Clarifications are made regarding the concentric nature of the shells and the implications for resistance calculations, with suggestions to rework the problem based on a clearer understanding of the electric field. The conversation highlights common misconceptions and the complexity of the problem, which is deemed more suitable for upper-division coursework. Overall, the thread seeks to resolve misunderstandings and refine the approach to the resistance calculation.
Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that a conductive shell a<b has a resistance of

R= (a-1-b-1)/(4πσ)


Homework Equations



c4f04c7069b5e15119a233c0744766f1.png


J = σE I = JA = σEA

R=(Va-Vb)/I

The Attempt at a Solution



My problem is my algebra i think.

First i found the electric field

Qenc= ρV = (Qr3)/(b3-a3)

E= (4πkQenc)(4πr2) = (KQr)/(b3-a3)


solve for potential

(Va-Vb)= (kQ)/(2(a-b))


Next step is where i think i messed up


I=σEA = [(KQr)/(b3-a3)]σ(4πr2)

= (4πKQσr3)/(b3-a3)

I insert for r3 for (b3-a3)

and get 4πKQσ=I

then R= V/I

[(kq)/(2(a-b))]/(4πKQσ) = (a-1-b-1)/(8πσ)

which isn't right. thanks for the help, hope its not to messy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is not quite right. You are looking between the two spheres. Since the gaussian sphere hasn't quite reached b yet, you are looking at the electric field produced by shell a. For the voltage, on the other hand, you want to integrate over the whole field from a to b.

Also that's a strange way to right the resistance. You realize it should be
R=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \left( \frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b} \right)
right?
 
Mindscrape said:
The electric field is not quite right. You are looking between the two spheres. Since the gaussian sphere hasn't quite reached b yet, you are looking at the electric field produced by shell a. For the voltage, on the other hand, you want to integrate over the whole field from a to b.

Also that's a strange way to right the resistance. You realize it should be
R=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \left( \frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b} \right)
right?

their not concentric, its a thick shelled sphere. I wrote it the way the textbook did pdf had to be in 2 files, its much cleaner
 

Attachments

Last edited:
What do you mean they are not concentric? If they aren't concentric then good luck solving analytically. Also, what do you mean it is a thick shell? If it is a thick shell of a solid conductor then the electric field is zero and you don't have a resistance.

I think what you mean to say is, yes, they are concentric, and, there is a material between a and b with conductivity \sigma[/tex] which makes a &quot;thick shell&quot;.<br /> <br /> One huge problem in your first pdf (a^2-b^2)/(a^3-b^3)≠1/(a-b). The best you could do is (a+b)/(a+b)^2.<br /> <br /> One of us has some major misconceptions about the problem. Let&#039;s see if we can clear that up first.
 
i pulled out my textbook and this is the question exactly

7-4.4 (a) Show that the resistance of a uniform spherical shell of radii a<b and conductivity sigma, for radial current flow, is
R= (a-1-b-1)/(4(pi)sigma), (b) show that, as b-a = d --> 0 and taking A 4pia2~4pib2, R reduces to

R= (rho(l))/A where rho is inverse sigma, A is cross sectional area and l is the length for a wire.



This question is kind of cruddy for an assignment question
 
Okay, I am pretty sure that my interpretation is correct because it gives the right answer. You have two shells, one with radius a that gives an electric field based on its charge, and another shell b that is concentric with shell a. Just give my way a try, and try to rework the problem with my previous suggestion.

To your credit, this is the type of problem that people usually see in an upper division course and never in a lower division course (granted it ought to be an easier problem for upper division).
 
Mindscrape said:
Okay, I am pretty sure that my interpretation is correct because it gives the right answer. You have two shells, one with radius a that gives an electric field based on its charge, and another shell b that is concentric with shell a. Just give my way a try, and try to rework the problem with my previous suggestion.

To your credit, this is the type of problem that people usually see in an upper division course and never in a lower division course (granted it ought to be an easier problem for upper division).

it is a very easy problem... yet the wording is throwing me for a loop
 
No problem, we all get tripped up now and again.

\mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epislon_0} \frac{Q}{r^2} \matbf{\hat{r}}
for b>r>a

So, now voltage...

V = -\int \mathbf{E} \cdot dl =...
 
Back
Top