MHB Angle between the tangents to the circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Circle
ramz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4819

Hi everyone, I need further explanations about the answer of this problem.
The answer is angle T = 87.9 degrees.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • circumcircle.jpg
    circumcircle.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 86
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ramz said:
Hi everyone, I need further explanations about the answer of this problem.
The answer is angle T = 87.9 degrees.

Thanks.

Use the cosine rule to evaluate the angle on the origin of the circle.

Radii and tangents to a circle are always perpendicular.

Once you realize this, you have three angles in the quadrilateral OBTA. The angle sum of a quadrilateral is 360 degrees. You should be able to evaluate angle T from there.
 
Ahh. Thank you so much.
 
Ahh. Thank you so much.
 
Prove It's method is more succinct, but here's an outline of what I did:

1.) Bisect $\triangle ABO$ and use the Pythagorean theorem to find the altitude.

2.) Use the law of sines to find $\angle OAB$.

3.) Use that fact the a tangent to a circle and a radius to the tangent point are perpendicular to find $\angle BAT$.

4.) Use the fact that $\angle BAT=\angle ABT$ and the sum of interior angles of a triangle being $180^{\circ}$ to find $\angle BTA$.

5.) Use the fact that $\angle BTA+\angle T=180^{\circ}$.

You should find $$\angle T=180^{\circ}\left(1-\frac{2}{\pi}\arccos\left(\frac{\sqrt{301}}{25}\right)\right)\approx87.89^{\circ}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top