Angle needed on banked corner of road.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lachlan1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the forces acting on a car navigating a banked corner without friction. The key equations involve the horizontal component of the normal force providing the centripetal force and the vertical component balancing the car's weight. Participants clarify that the normal force cannot simply be expressed as mgcosθ due to the car's horizontal acceleration. A free body diagram (FBD) is recommended to visualize the forces more clearly. The conversation emphasizes that the normal force must account for both gravitational and centripetal forces to prevent the car from losing contact with the banked surface.
Lachlan1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this example is in the txtbook so i know the answer, but i don't really get the second part.

The road needs to be at a banked angle so the car traveling at 13.4m/s can go around with no friction needed, the radius of the corner is 35m.



Homework Equations



the given contructed equations are
Fr=nsinө = (mv^2)/r i get this part, just the horizontal component of the normal force, which is the centripedal force.

then they use
Fy=ncosө – mg = 0
which i can see from the diagram is the vertical component of the normal force, less the weight force of the car. Why do they use this though?

they then divide the two equations.


The Attempt at a Solution



i got the first equation, and initially tried to write n, the normal force as mgcosө, and then substitute it into the first equation. Why is this not the normal force? like for an inclined plane example? and why do they subtract the car weight force from the verticle component of the normal force?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lachlan1 said:
...tried to write n, the normal force as mgcosө...

Try N = mg/cos θ... :wink:
 
Lachlan1 said:
then they use
Fy=ncosө – mg = 0
which i can see from the diagram is the vertical component of the normal force, less the weight force of the car. Why do they use this though?
Is the car accelerating in the vertical (y) direction? If it is not accelerating in the y-direction, then the y-components of all the forces involved must add up to zero.
i got the first equation, and initially tried to write n, the normal force as mgcosө, and then substitute it into the first equation. Why is this not the normal force?
The car is accelerating in the horizontal direction (which can be expressed as the resultant force). This resultant force has to come from somewhere. So the normal force not only involves the force of gravity (in the vertical direction) but the resultant force too (in the horizontal direction).

I suggest starting with a free body diagram (FBD). By looking at the forces in the FBD, it should be more clear. :smile:
like for an inclined plane example?
In most inclined plane examples, the objects are not accelerating with respect to the surface of the plane (they may or may not be accelerating parallel to it, but there usually is no acceleration component perpendicular to the plane). This problem is different.
and why do they subtract the car weight force from the verticle component of the normal force?
Is the car accelerating up or down? :wink:
 
thanks for the replies. No, the car is not accelerating in the verticle direction, so i can see why the forces in the verticle must equal zero. I have been looking at a link at the bottom of the page to a question posted on here over a year ago which was asking the same question i am.
 
The first equation comes from centripetal force which you already figured out.
The second equation is the equation to keep The Car from moving in the air.
So, consider a box on floor => for that you would do N = mg
In this case. N = mgcostheta. because you don't want car to fly from the banked surface.

Just look at diagram(red thing is car(best i could draw in paint))
but
first eqn. is eqn for x-comp.
second eqn is eqn for y-comp

Also note: Normal is always perpendicular to surface and Force due to Gravity is always downwards
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 406
utkarsh1 said:
The first equation comes from centripetal force which you already figured out.
The second equation is the equation to keep The Car from moving in the air.
So, consider a box on floor => for that you would do N = mg
In this case. N = mgcostheta. because you don't want car to fly from the banked surface.

Sorry utkarsh1, but you haven't got your FBD quite right. The normal force is definitely not mgcosθ. That would only be true if there was no other acceleration happening that has a component parallel to the normal force. In this problem, the car is accelerating such that the acceleration is not perpendicular to the normal force. So mgcosθ, by itself, is not the normal force for this problem.

Lachlan1, Try this FBD (if your textbook doesn't already have its own FBD).
 

Attachments

  • Car on Bank.gif
    Car on Bank.gif
    6.2 KB · Views: 531
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top