Angle of Curve for Centripetal Force w/ Radius 60m & Speed 70 km/hr

  • Thread starter Thread starter tyfiem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centripedal Force
tyfiem
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A curve of radius 60m is banked so that a car traveling with uniform speed 70 km/hr can round the curve without relying on friction to keep it from slipping to its left or right. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. What is the angle of the curve?

im using a=v^2/r, but when I get the acceleration, I don't know what to do no more.. i think it might be sin theta = g/a but I am not sure.. can anyone check? thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tyfiem said:
A curve of radius 60m is banked so that a car traveling with uniform speed 70 km/hr can round the curve without relying on friction to keep it from slipping to its left or right. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. What is the angle of the curve?

im using a=v^2/r, but when I get the acceleration, I don't know what to do no more.. i think it might be sin theta = g/a but I am not sure.. can anyone check? thanks in advance!
What is the net vertical acceleration? So what is the net vertical force? What are the sources of vertical force? (what force balances the force of gravity?). What is the net horizontal force? What is the source of this force?

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top