Angle of refraction through ice into water

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle of refraction of light passing from ice into water, Snell's law must be applied at both interfaces. The refractive index of ice and water is essential for accurate calculations. First, calculate the angle of refraction in the ice using the angle of incidence of 15.0°, then use that result as the angle of incidence for the transition into water. The parallel nature of the ice does not affect the application of Snell's law, as it applies at each surface. This method ensures a correct understanding of how light bends at each interface.
goWlfpack
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A layer of ice having parallel sides floats on water. If light is incident on the upper surface of the ice at an angle of incidence of 15.0°, what is the angle of refraction in the water?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i know its not so simple that i can just use Sin theta n1 = sin theta n2... but i don't know how the fact that it is parallel will change the equation. Should i find the angle of refraction in the ice and then use that as the angle of incidence for the water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation only applies at a point on the surface - being parallel just means that you don't care where on the surface.

It's almost the same as the typical experiment with light going through a glass block.
You simply apply Snell's law ( n1 sin t1 = n2 sin t2 ) at each surface.
You will need the refractive index of ice and remember which way light bends at each surface.
 
goWlfpack said:
Should i find the angle of refraction in the ice and then use that as the angle of incidence for the water?

Yup. That's how you should go about this problem. Use Snell's law twice, once at each interface.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top