Angle of Turn from Kampala to Singapore: Solving with Law of Cosines

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugzieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Position
AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle of turn from Kampala to Singapore, the Earth’s radius of approximately 4000 miles and the distance of 5000 miles between the two cities are essential. The discussion highlights the use of the law of cosines and proportions to find the angle, with the circumference of the Earth at the equator being about 25,000 miles. A proportion can be set up as 360 degrees over 25,000 miles equals the unknown angle over 5000 miles. The conversation also touches on the arc-length formula, suggesting that trigonometric methods may not be necessary for this circular problem. Overall, the solution involves understanding the relationship between distance and angular measurement on a spherical surface.
mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
The Earth's radius is about 4000 miles. Kampala, the capital of Uganda, and Singapore are both nearly on the equator. The distance between them is 5000 miles.Through what angle do you turn, relative to the earth, if you fly from Kampala to Singapore?

the only thing i can think of doing is using the law of cosines, if both sides equal 4000 miles and the other side of the tirangle is equal to 5000k miles...but i tried that it doesn't work..i tried using all the trig functions and it still didnt work..would someone just point me to the direction that will get me started...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just a proportion. 360 degrees around the equator is about 25,000 miles.

\frac{360^o}{25,000\, \textrm{mi}} = \frac{x}{5000\, \textrm{mi}}

Solve for x.

- Warren
 
how did you know how to set up that proportion, I am sorry i don't see it too clearly. i mean your method was correct kuz i got the correct answer, but i just don't see how u set up the proportion. how did you know that 360degrees around the Earth is 25000 miles?
 
25000 miles is the circumference of the Earth at the equator (approximately). In your question, it would be better to use 2 \pi (4000 \mbox{miles} ), though, since the question gives you the radius of the Earth as 4000 miles.
 
thanks for the input guys. but, if we wanted to solve this problem trigonometrically, what would be a good way to do it?
 
It's a circle, man. There's no trigonometry involved. You can use the arc-length formula if you'd like: s = r\theta, which is essentially what I already did.

- Warren
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top