I Angles between complex vectors

AI Thread Summary
To find the angle between two complex 4-dimensional vectors, one can use either the Euclidean angle or the Hermitian angle, depending on the context. The Euclidean angle is derived from the real part of the inner product in the decomplexified real space, while the Hermitian angle utilizes the absolute value of the complex inner product. The discussion also touches on the concept of orthonormal bases and how they relate to angles in both complex and real spaces. Additionally, there is a query about determining the angle between states in a complex Hilbert space, emphasizing the relationship between distance and angle in this framework. Understanding these angles is crucial for applications in complex vector spaces.
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11
So I was trying to learn how to find the angle between two complex 4-dimentional vectors. I came across this paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/9904077.pdf which I found to be a little confusing and as a result not overly helpful. I was wondering if anyone could help at all?

Many thanks in advance :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Assuming that you have a ##4## dimensional complex vector space ##V_{\mathbb{C}}## you have essentially two possibility, You can consider the complex space isometric to the real space ##\mathbb{R}^{8}## so you have the relation for the Euclidean angle ##\Theta##:

\cos{\Theta(A,B)}=\frac{(A,B)}{|A||B|}

where ##(,)## is the product in ##\mathbb{R}^{8}## or you can consider your complex space isometric to ##\mathbb{C}^{4}## and have the relation for the Hermitian angle ##\Theta_{c}##:

\cos{\Theta_{c}(A,B)}=\frac{(A,B)_{\mathbb{C}}}{|A||B|}

where now ##(,)_{\mathbb{C}}## is the hermitian product on ## \mathbb{C}^{4}##. Defining and almost complex structure you can have other kind of angles (Kahler) but depends what you need ... the last part of the article works in order to find relations between these kind of angles ...
 
Just to expand on the Euclidean and Hermitian angles, since complex angles can be a bit confusing: if a Hermitian (complex) inner product is defined on ##\mathbb{C}^{4}##, then the complex angle between two complex vectors ##v## and ##w## is defined as

$$\cos\theta_{c}\equiv\frac{\left\langle v,w\right\rangle }{\left\Vert v\right\Vert \left\Vert w\right\Vert }.$$

Both the angle and its cosine are in general complex. The Euclidean angle is defined by taking the real part of the cosine, to get a real angle:

$$\cos\theta_{E}\equiv\frac{\mathrm{Re}\left(\left\langle v,w\right\rangle \right)}{\left\Vert v\right\Vert \left\Vert w\right\Vert }.$$

If we take an orthonormal basis in ##\mathbb{C}^{4}## based on the Hermitian inner product, this gives an orthonormal basis of ##\mathbb{R}^{8}## via decomplexification (removing the possibility of complex multiplication of scalars), which in turn defines a real inner product on ##\mathbb{R}^{8}##. The Euclidean angle is equal to the angle between the vectors under this decomplexification. Note that a Euclidean angle of ##\pi/2## does not ensure a vanishing Hermitian inner product.

If we instead take the modulus (absolute value) of the cosine, this defines the Hermitian angle, which is again real:

$$\cos\theta_{H}\equiv\frac{\left|\left\langle v,w\right\rangle \right|}{\left\Vert v\right\Vert \left\Vert w\right\Vert }.$$

This angle, just like the angle in Euclidean space, is the ratio of the orthogonal projection of ##v## onto ##w## over the norm of ##v## (or the reverse). However, it's important to remember that the orthogonal projection here uses the Hermitian inner product, so that parallel vectors in ##\mathbb{C}^{4}## may be orthogonal using the corresponding real inner product in ##\mathbb{R}^{8}##.

More details here: https://www.mathphysicsbook.com/mathematics/abstract-algebra/generalizing-vectors/norms-of-vectors/
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Hello everybody, nice answers.
I was wondering if I can write down the angle between two states in a complex Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_N## of any dimension. I know that the distance ##|d|## between the state ##|\psi\rangle## and the state ##|\phi\rangle## would be
$$|d\rangle = |\psi\rangle - |\phi\rangle \: ,$$
and then
$$|d| = \sqrt{\langle d | d \rangle} \: .$$
Am I right? But what about the angle?
Thank you so much :biggrin:
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top