Angular acceleration and displacement problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a compact disc that accelerates uniformly from rest to 5200 RPM over a displacement of 620 radians. The user seeks confirmation on the values they are using for angular velocity and displacement in their calculations. They correctly convert the final angular velocity to radians per second and identify initial conditions for their equations. A suggestion is made to maintain algebraic variable forms until the final equation to minimize errors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate value substitution in solving angular motion problems.
Lotus93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've listed the whole problem because I know I'll have more questions, but all I want to know atm is whether I'm plugging the right values into the equation. Thanks in advance for your help.

Homework Statement


A compact disc speeds up uniformly from rest to 5200rpm in 620rad. The disc’s diameter is 5.0cm.

a. What is the angular acceleration in rad/s^2?
b. How long does it take to reach this speed?
c. What is the total angular displacement in degrees?
d. How many revolutions does the disc make in this time?
e. What is its centripetal acceleration at maximum speed?

Homework Equations



θ = (1/2)αt2
ωf2 = ωi2 + 2αθ

The Attempt at a Solution


For part A, first I would convert angular velocity to rad/sec
So 5200 rot/min = (5200*2pi) rad/(60 sec) = 544 rad/sec
Since I don't know time yet, I would use the second equation above.

The first thing I want to ask is if my values for ωf, ωi, and θ are correct.
ωf, = 544
ωi = 0
θ = 620 radians
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. As a matter of technique, I always keep things in algebraic variable form (i.e. using the labels for the quantities) until I have the final equation, and only then plug in the constants. This makes it easier to find algebraic errors, easier for others to follow, and avoids propagation of rounding errors.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top