Angular acceleration and it's mass dependancy

j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wooden door is closed by applying a perpendicular force to it. If the magnitude of the force is constant and takes 2 seconds for the door to close, how long would it take to close the door with the same amount of force, in the same manner, if the door was made of a material 4 times heavier than the wood? Assume the door is initially at rest and neglect friction.

The Attempt at a Solution



-Angular acceleration is torque/moment of inertia

-\alpha= \frac{N.m}{kg.m.m} so for a constant force and length of door, the angular acceleration is inversely proportional to the mass.

-So, if the door is 4 times the mass, the acceleration is 4 times smaller.

-I then applied a constant acceleration equation: s=ut+\frac{1}{2}a^{2} to circular motion:

-\theta=\frac{1}{2}\alphat^{2}

-So, if r is a constant, then \alpha is inversely proportional to t^{2}

-Therefore, if you make \alpha 4 times smaller, then t will double.

So, finally, t=4s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems to make sense... is 4s the right answer?
 
I have no way of knowing. This question is from a university past paper for which there is no mark scheme. That's why I posted it here really.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top