Angular Acceleration. Im totally lost

AI Thread Summary
A computer disk starts from rest and has a constant angular acceleration, completing its second revolution in 0.570 seconds. The discussion focuses on determining the time taken for the first revolution and calculating the angular acceleration. The conversion of revolutions to radians is noted, with 2 revolutions equating to 12.57 radians. Participants emphasize using the equation for angular displacement to find angular acceleration and then solving for time at half the distance. The conversation highlights the importance of applying angular motion equations similarly to linear motion.
beanieb
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A computer disk is turned on starting from rest and has constant anglular acceleration. If it took 0.570s for the drive to make its second complete revolution, how long did it take to make the first complete revolution? Also what is its angular acceleration


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

The homework template is there for a reason, please use it. You are expected to show some effort in solving the problem yourself when asking for help.
 
Well I know the inital velocity is zero (starting from rest) and the time is given. Converting 2 revs to rads is 12.57. So it completes 12.57 rads in 0.570s. I am also aware that ang accel = ang vel/time. I am just going around in circles trying to work it out. I was fairly sure it was wrong to assume speed is 22rad/s. (12.57/.570). Sorry if that's not enough but I am totally lost. First post so I wasnt sure what to put up
 
beanieb said:
Well I know the inital velocity is zero (starting from rest) and the time is given. Converting 2 revs to rads is 12.57. So it completes 12.57 rads in 0.570s. I am also aware that ang accel = ang vel/time. I am just going around in circles trying to work it out. I was fairly sure it was wrong to assume speed is 22rad/s. (12.57/.570). Sorry if that's not enough but I am totally lost. First post so I wasnt sure what to put up

Angular calculations are pretty much the same as linear. Recall then that:

x = 1/2*a*t2

In your case use x as radians and solve for a.

Armed with a (which is your angular acceleration by the way) solve for t at half the distance - which is one revolution.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top