Angular Acceleration of a rubber wheel

AI Thread Summary
A small rubber wheel with a radius of 2.0 cm accelerates at 7.2 rad/s² and drives a larger pottery wheel with a radius of 21.0 cm without slipping. The relationship between the two wheels indicates that the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel will be smaller than that of the small wheel due to the difference in radii. The linear velocities and accelerations of both wheels are equal when in contact. Using the formula a = r1*alpha1 = r2*alpha2, the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel can be calculated. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the wheels to solve the problem effectively.
jmcmillian
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A small rubber wheel is used to drive a large pottery wheel. The two wheels are mounted so that their circular edges touch. The small wheel has a radius of 2.0 cm and accelerates at the rate of 7.2 rad/s^2, and it is in contact with the pottery wheel (radius 21.0 cm) without slipping.

(A)Calculate the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel
(B)and the time it takes the pottery wheel to reach its required speed of 65 RPM.



\omega=\omega{0}+\alphat


I don't know enough about pottery wheels to know if they are all made the same, but based on the problem I want to assume that the smaller wheel is inside the bigger wheel, that way the outer edge of the small wheel turns the inner edge of the pottery wheel. This may be where I am wrong...but that's what I'm rolling with for now.

If that is the case, then the velocity of the smaller wheel ought to be the initial velocity of the larger wheel, then there should be some sort of proportional relationship between the two based on the difference in radii. As a matter of fact, I venture to say that the acceleration for the larger wheel (what I'm looking for) will be much smaller than the 7.2 rad/s^2 given for the small wheel.

Carrying on, then \omega (small wheel) will equal 7.2t. This would be equal to the initial \omega of the wheel.

Beyond that, I don't know where to go from there. Any clues would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the two wheels are in contact and rotating without slip, there linear velocities and acceleration are the same. Hence r1w1 = r2w2 = v and
a = r1*alpha1 = r2*alpha2. From the given data find the angular acceleration of pottary wheel.
 
Ahhhhhhhhhh yes. I've done so much physics tonight that I think I often lose focus of the problem and wind up going on wild goose chases when it's a lot simpler than it should be. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top