Angular and Linear Velocity Calculations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular and linear velocities for a driver wheel with specific parameters. The angular velocity (Omega) is calculated as 78.53 rad/s based on the wheel's maximum speed of 750 rpm. The relationship between linear speed and angular speed is questioned, highlighting the need for further calculations. The maximum force transmitted by the belt is linked to the normal force and static friction coefficient, emphasizing the importance of understanding friction in this context. Lastly, the calculation of angular retardation when the wheel speed is reduced to 300 rpm over 10 seconds is addressed, with suggestions for using relevant equations of motion.
Britannia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please could I have some help with the following question:

A driver wheel, which runs a drive belt has a diameter of 600mm and can run at a maximum speed of 750rpm. If the belt has a static coefficient of friction of 0.9 and a dynamic coefficient of friction of 0.87, calculate:

a) The angular velocity (Omega) of the wheel in rad/s.

b)The linear velocity of the wheel.

c) If the normal force between the belt and the driver wheel is 750N, what will be the maximum force which can be transmitted when the belt is running at a constant speed? Explain your answer.

d) If the speed of the wheel is reduced to 300rpm, over a period of 10s, calaulate the angular retardation.

Thanks for any help,

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is what I got for a):

Omega1 = 750x2PI/60 = 78.53rad/s
 
Britannia said:
This is what I got for a):

Omega1 = 750x2PI/60 = 78.53rad/s

Good so far.

b) What is the relationship between linear speed and angular speed? I.e. do you know of a relationship between v and \omega?

c) I don't like the wording on this one. I'm assuming the question is talking about the force on the track being transmitted by the driver wheel because that's the only question we can answer. So, assuming the track is not slipping on the driver wheel the friction is static. We know the normal force and the coefficient of static friction...

d) Assume you know that the angular retardation is constant. (Or that you are finding the average angular retardation.) You know the change in angular speed, and you know how long it takes to do it. There are four equations that are typically used:
\theta=\theta_0+\omega_0t+(1/2)\alpha t^2
\theta=\theta_0+(1/2)(\omega_0+\omega )t
\omega=\omega_0+\alpha t
\omega^2=\omega_0^2+\alpha (\theta - \theta_0)
Which one looks useful?

-Dan
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top