Angular momentum commutator derivation

asja
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to prove:
L_xL_y - LyLx = ihL_z

Unfortunately I keep getting L_xL_y - L_yL_x = -ihL_z and I was hoping someone could spot the error in my calculations:

L_xL_y - L_yL_x = ( yp_z - zp_y )( zp_x - xp_z ) - ( zp_x - xp_z )( yp_z - zp_y )
= yp_zzp_x - yp_zxp_z - zp_yzp_x + zp_yxp_z - zp_xyp_z + zp_xzp_y + xp_zyp_z - xp_zzp_y
= p_zz( yp_x - xp_y ) + zp_z( p_yx - p_xy )
= p_zzL_z - zp_zL_z
= L_z( p_zz - zp_z )
= -ihL_z

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome,

L_z = x p_y - y p_x

You have it the other way around.
 
D'oh. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top