Angular momentum conservation and constant velocity as expla

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the conservation of angular momentum in a rotating frame, specifically using the example of a ball on a frictionless carousel. When the ball receives a radial impulse, its path appears straight in an inertial frame but deviates in the rotating frame due to the Coriolis force. While angular momentum with respect to the carousel's center is conserved, the tangential velocity of the ball does not remain constant as it moves away from the center. The distinction between the conservation of angular momentum (represented by r²ω) and the changing tangential velocity (rω) is emphasized, with the former being conserved and the latter not. Overall, the two descriptions are not equivalent, as angular momentum remains a valid concept even when the motion is not circular.
Soren4
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
I'm confused about situations involving rotating frames in which the angular momentum is conserved and the initial velocity does not change. I'll make an example.

Take a rotating carousel (constant angular velocity) with no friction on it and a ball. At the initial time instant the ball has the same velocity of the carousel and is far from the center ##O##. It is given a radial impulse, so that it gains a radial velocity also.

In a inertial frame the path of the ball is a straight line, while in the rotating frame it is deviated by Coriolis force.

The angular momentum of the ball is conserved with respect to ##O## in the inertial frame. Nevertheless I read many times that the "deviation" in rotating frame can be explained if we think about the fact that the ball has a greater tangential velocity than the rest of the carousel, so it appears to go faster.

So on the one side we have that, taking the center of the turntable ##O## as pivot ##L=mrv_{\theta}=mr^2\omega## is conserved, on the other hand that the initial velocity ##v= \omega r## does not change.

Neglecting ##m##, saying that ##r^2 \omega## and ##r \omega## are constant is definitely not the same thing. But are both of them conserved in this case?

In this kind of situation are the two description (the one that uses the fact of greater velocity and the other that is based on the conservation of angular momentum) equivalent?
Is there one more correct to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soren4 said:
So on the one side we have that, taking the center of the turntable ##O## as pivot ##L=mrv_{\theta}=mr^2\omega## is conserved, on the other hand that the initial velocity ##v= \omega r## does not change.

Neglecting ##m##, saying that ##r^2 \omega## and ##r \omega## are constant is definitely not the same thing. But are both of them conserved in this case?
##r\omega## is not conserved, because that is the tangential component of velocity, which does not remain constant. As the ball, after release, moves further away from the carousal centre, its linear velocity ##v## remains constant, but the radial component increases and the tangential component decreases, as they are functions of position.

##r^2\omega## is conserved however. Angular momentum is still meaningful, and is still conserved, when a body is not in circular motion.
 
  • Like
Likes Soren4

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
676
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K