Angular Momentum: Disk + Point Mass at Margin

AI Thread Summary
The angular momentum of a disk with a point mass at its margin can be calculated by adding their individual moments of inertia, expressed as L = (I(disc) + I(point mass))w, where w is the angular velocity. The point mass contributes L = mR²w, while the disk contributes L = 1/2 MR²w. Using the moment of inertia tensor would yield the same result, as the axis of rotation is a principal axis. The calculation involves integrating the densities of the disk and point mass. This approach clarifies the relationship between the components of angular momentum in the system.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
I asked myself,whether the angular momentum of a disk rotating free in horizontal plane when there is a point mass at the margin of the disc, is given by:
L = (I(disc)+I(point mass))w where w is the angular velocity.

or do I have to use the moment of inertia tensor. i am a little bit confused now...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right in just adding the two moments of inertia, that is the same as adding their angular momentum together, which you can do: if you imagine the particle was there without the disk, it would have L=mR2w, and the disk would have L=1/2 MR2w, and then to get the total you could just add the two.

Assuming the disk is rotating about its center, if you used the moment of inertia tensor it would come out to the same thing. I think that that axis would be one of the principal axes, and you would have an integral of x2 + y2 multiplied by the corresponding densities, which would be a circle and a delta function.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top