Angular momentum/Hamiltonian operators, magnetic field, basis states problem?

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
Here's my problem, probably not that difficult in reality but I don't get how to approach it, and I've got an exam coming up soon...

An atom with total angular momentum l=1 is prepared in an eigenstate of Lx, with an eigenvalue of \hbar. (Lx is the angular momentum operator for the x-component). It then passes into a region where there is a uniform magnetic field B in the z-direction. The Hamiltonian acting on the angular part of the wavefunction in the magnetic field is:
H = \frac{e}{2m_e}BL_z where me is the electron mass.

I have to "Express the initial state of the angular momentum in the basis of the eigenstate of this Hamiltonian."

I am also given the matrix representation of the operators Lx Ly and Lz:

[ 0 1 0 ]
[ 1 0 1 ]
[ 0 1 0 ]\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} = L_x

[ 0 1 0 ]
[-1 0 1 ]
[ 0 -1 0]-i\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} = L_y

[1 0 0 ]
[0 0 0 ]
[0 0 -1]\hbar = L_z

So, I haven't really made much progress with this. What I've thought so far is to start with v being the initial eigenstate the atom is in before the field comes, so that
L_xv = \hbar v

and then when the field is on, the atom is going to be in one of the eigenstates ui of the operator H, where Hu_i = \frac{e}{2m_e}BL_zu_i

Am I actually being asked to write v in terms of a linear combination of ui's?
If so, then I am stumped as to how to proceed next, and if not, then I haven't got the slightest clue what I'm supposed to be doing.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First you diagonalize the matrix representing Lx. The state you want is the eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue +\hbar.
 
kuruman said:
First you diagonalize the matrix representing Lx. The state you want is the eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue +\hbar.

I wasn't sure what diagonalizing meant so I looked on wikipedia. Apparently, if I have an NxN matrix with N eigenvalues, diagonalizing it means writing a diagonal matrix of those 3 eigenvalues, with zeros everywhere else, right?

well, we are only given one eigenvalue for the Lx matrix, namely \hbar - how can I make a 3x3 diagonal matrix out of that?
I'm still really not sure what's meant to be going on here...
 
jeebs said:
I wasn't sure what diagonalizing meant so I looked on wikipedia. Apparently, if I have an NxN matrix with N eigenvalues, diagonalizing it means writing a diagonal matrix of those 3 eigenvalues, with zeros everywhere else, right?

well, we are only given one eigenvalue for the Lx matrix, namely \hbar - how can I make a 3x3 diagonal matrix out of that?
I'm still really not sure what's meant to be going on here...
Look at this link

http://www.fen.bilkent.edu.tr/~degt/math220/diag.pdf

It provides an example for a 3x3 matrix just like you have. Try to follow the example and if you get stuck let me know.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top