Angular Momentum Incorrect Graph?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving the calculation of angular momentum, where the participant questions the accuracy of a graph related to the velocity vector. They note that the graph indicates a velocity magnitude of 6 instead of the required 5.5 m/s, leading to confusion about the problem's solvability. Clarification is sought regarding the distinction between the direction indicated by the path AB and the actual velocity vector. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding unit vectors to determine the correct direction for calculations. Ultimately, the focus is on ensuring accurate representation of vectors in physics problems.
gv3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Determine the total magnitude of angular momentum Ho of the particle about point O. The velocity of the particle is 5.5 m/s.
engineering 4.png

Homework Equations


Ho= r x mv

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 43.04. My question is, isn't the graph wrong? If you take the magnitude of the vector shown in the graph, it doesn't equal 5.5 it equals 6. Without the proper vector from the graph isn't the problem unsolvable? I only knew the answer because i was asked this question twice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only vector I can see indicated in the figure is V, which is shown to be directed along the path AB. AB itself is not the velocity vector, it just indicates its direction.
 
gneill said:
The only vector I can see indicated in the figure is V, which is shown to be directed along the path AB. AB itself is not the velocity vector, it just indicates its direction.
But isn't that vector 2i-4j-4k?
 
gv3 said:
But isn't that vector 2i-4j-4k?
A position vector from A to B might be that, and it would have the same direction as V. But it is not V.
 
gneill said:
A position vector from A to B might be that, and it would have the same direction as V. But it is not V.
My mistake you are right. How would the velocity vector be found then? My professor in his lecture notes looks like he just took the direction of V shown.
 
All you need to take from the vector AB is its direction. Are you familiar with unit vectors? Can you form a unit vector that has the same direction as AB?
 
gneill said:
All you need to take from the vector AB is its direction. Are you familiar with unit vectors? Can you form a unit vector that has the same direction as AB?
yeah it would just be the position vector divided by the magnitude.
 
Back
Top