Angular Momentum of 1.80-kg Particle in xy Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a 1.80-kg particle moving in the xy plane with a given velocity and position vector. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect result of -29.016 kg m²/s, while another participant calculated approximately -27 kg m²/s. The correct formula used is angular momentum L = r × p, where p is the momentum of the particle. The final computed value for angular momentum is -27.018 kg m²/s, indicating a potential misunderstanding or error in the initial calculations. The conversation highlights challenges with LaTeX formatting and the importance of accuracy in physics calculations.
AEfly
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.80-kg particle moves in the xy plane with a velocity of = (4.30i − 3.70j ) m/s. Determine the angular momentum of the particle about the origin when its position vector is = (1.50i + 2.20j ) m.


The Attempt at a Solution



I get an answer of -29.016 Kg m2 per second using a known method but it comes out as incorrect. An ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what did you try? I get about -27 when I work it out.
 
The angular momentum is

\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}

where p is the momentum

we have

\vec{r} = (1.50 \hat{i} + 2.20 \hat{j} + 0 \hat{k} ) \textnormal{m}

and

\vec{p} = m ( \vec{v} ) = m ( 4.30 \hat{i} - 3.70 \hat{j} + 0 \hat{k} ) \textnormal{ m / s }

then

\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p} = (1.50 \hat{i} + 2.20 \hat{j} + 0 \hat{k} ) \textnormal{m} \times m ( 4.30 \hat{i} - 3.70 \hat{j} + 0 \hat{k} ) \textnormal{ m / s }

This is

\vec{L} = - 27.018 \hat{k} \textnormal{ kg m^2 / s }
 
AlexChandler said:
This is

\vec{L} = - 27.018 \hat{k} \textnormal{ kg m^2 / s }

Ignore everything after kg m^2 / s ... I don't know what this has happened... I tried to fix it. Why is this happening? I am new to latex by the way :D
 
that's wild. i have never seen that, it is like the latex abyss.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top