Angular Momentum of a Ball at Half Height

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the angular momentum of a ball shot vertically upward and its torque about a point due to gravitational force at different heights. The subject area includes concepts of angular momentum, kinematics, and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for angular momentum at maximum height and halfway back to the ground, questioning the assumptions made regarding initial velocity and displacement in the equations used.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the calculations, identifying potential errors in sign and assumptions. Some have provided guidance on checking calculations and considering the correct signs for displacement in the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the correct interpretation of the kinematic equations and the implications of using zero initial velocity at maximum height. Participants note the importance of considering the direction of displacement when calculating velocity at half height.

ScreamingIntoTheVoid

Homework Statement


In the figure, a 0.400 kg ball is shot directly upward at initial speed 58.3 m/s. What is its angular momentum about P, 1.42 m horizontally from the launch point, when the ball is (a) at maximum height and (b) halfway back to the ground? What is the torque on the ball about P due to the gravitational force when the ball is (c) at maximum height and (d) halfway back to the ground?

Homework Equations


v^2=(v0)^2 -2gx
L=m(r x v)
J= F x r

The Attempt at a Solution


I got a,c, and d right (I'm including them just in case some other confused soul passes by and needs a hint), but I couldn't get b.

a) 0 because velocity is 0
b)
Max height: v^2=(v0)^2 -2gx --> 0 = (58.3^2) -2(9.8)x --> 173.4127551 m -->divide by 2 to get half height = 86.70637755 m
again, v^2=(v0)^2 -2gx --> v^2=0 - 2(9.8)(86.70637755) --> -39.50588305 m/s [assuming the math is right]
L=mrv --> (0.4kg)(-39.505m/s)(1.42m) --> -22.43934157 kg*m^2/s [This is wrong even if I just do magnitude]
c and d) f x r=J --> (fx)(ry)-(fy)(rx)= J ~> (got right so the answer doesn't matter)

Can anyone tell me what went wrong in problem b? Thanks in advance to anyone who responds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
v^2=0 - 2(9.8)(86.70637755)

Note that the left side is positive (it's the square of a number) while the right hand side is negative. So, something's wrong here. Once you identify the source of the sign error, check the calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ScreamingIntoTheVoid
TSny said:
Note that the left side is positive (it's the square of a number) while the right hand side is negative. So, something's wrong here. Once you identify the source of the sign error, check the calculation.
Oh, your right if I left it there I'd get an imaginary root rather than the -39. Would V0 be what I'm looking for rather than V or is there something else I'm not noticing that's off?
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
Oh, your right if I left it there I'd get an imaginary root rather than the -39. Would V0 be what I'm looking for rather than V or is there something else I'm not noticing that's off?
You need to think about the sign of x in your equation v^2=(v0)^2 -2gx. You set V0 = 0. So, I think that means that you are considering the mass falling back down from its maximum height. But as it falls, the displacement x it downward.

Use your calculator to check your calculation of the number 39.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ScreamingIntoTheVoid
TSny said:
You need to think about the sign of x in your equation v^2=(v0)^2 -2gx. You set V0 = 0. So, I think that means that you are considering the mass falling back down from its maximum height. But as it falls, the displacement x it downward.
Ok, that makes sense. So instead it would be v^2=0 +2(9.8)(86.70637755) --> 39.50588305. That'd still get me 22.43934157 in the end though.
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
Ok, that makes sense. So instead it would be v^2=0 +2(9.8)(86.70637755) --> 39.50588305. That'd still get me 22.43934157 in the end though.
You must be making a careless error in crunching out the number 39.5
 
You're right, got 41.2 this time, I suppose I just suck at sticking things into my calculator. Thanks!
 
Good work. We all make such errors.
 
1. When you calculate v at half height, since you are using v0 = 0 at the top, the x in the formula for v2 should be negative. So you will get v2 positive. I am getting the value for v slightly higher than you got so you should check that.

2. You used the components of F and r, when you calculated the torque. Why did you not do the same thing when you calculated the angular momentum? Use the correct rx, ry, vx, vy and you will get the answer.
 
  • #10
41.2 m/s is correct for the speed at half height.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K