Angular momentum of a rotating door

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a rotating door just before it hits a stop. The key equation derived is that the angular momentum about point S is given by L = MωL(s/2 - L/3) in the z-direction. Participants clarify the use of the parallel axis theorem and the distinction between angular velocities at points H and S. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both the linear motion of the center of mass and the rotation about that center to accurately compute the total angular momentum. Overall, the final expression for angular momentum is confirmed as correct.
bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A door ( a rod of length ##L##, mass ##M##) rotates with angular velocity ##\omega## about a point ## H ##, and approaches a stop at ##S##. ##H## and ##S## are along the same line, and separated by a distance ## s ##. Show that the angular momentum of the door about the point ##S## just before it hits the stop is:

$$ \mathbf{L} = M \omega L \bigg( \frac{s}{2} - \frac{l}{3}\bigg) \mathbf{\hat{z}} $$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


- Use definition of angular momentum and apply parallel axis theorem.[/B]
Since rotation is about the z axis - (i.e the axis through ##H##) we have ## \vec{\omega} = \omega \mathbf{\hat{z}}## so:
$$ \mathbf{L} = I \omega \mathbf{\hat{z}} $$
Notation ## I_{s}## means "moment of inertia evaluated at S". The moment of inertia of a rod as described about the centre of mass is ## \frac{M}{12}L^{2}## so, by parallel axis theorem:
$$ I_{s} = \frac{M}{12}L^{2} +M\big( \frac{L}{2}-s\big)^{2} =\frac{ML^{2}}{3}+Ms^{2} -MLs$$

Therefore:
$$\mathbf{L} = M\omega\big(\frac{L^{2}}{3}+s^{2} -Ls\big)\mathbf{\hat{z}} $$
What has gone wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct.

Is it really a lower case "l" in their answer?
 
CWatters said:
I think you are correct.

Is it really a lower case "l" in their answer?

Ah no, sorry - it should be ##L## . This was part of a final year exam question, so I'm pretty sure I must be wrong somewhere!
 
Hi guys,
bananabandana said:
Therefore:
$$\mathbf{L} = M\omega\big(\frac{L^{2}}{3}+s^{2} -Ls\big)\mathbf{\hat{z}}$$​
I agree, provided you use the ##\omega## around S, not the ##\omega## around H ... :rolleyes:
 
BvU said:
Hi guys,

I agree, provided you use the ##\omega## around S, not the ##\omega## around H ... :rolleyes:
Why aren't the two the same? Surely the whole system is connected and therefore has the same ##\omega##
 
No.
 
That's a bit short, I concede. Must admit I don't have the answer worked out in full, but this is what came to mind:
upload_2017-2-22_17-43-46.png
$$\theta {L\over 2} = - \theta' \left (s - {L\over 2}\right ) \Rightarrow \dot \theta {L\over 2} = -\dot \theta' \left (s - {L\over 2}\right )$$

(all for ##\theta \downarrow 0##, of course)

The least it does is give us a minus sign for s > L/2

My memory of the definition is ##\omega = {d\theta\over dt}##

H and S see different ##\theta## (or the same ##\vec v_{\rm c.o.m.}## from different distances)

PS I like the
bananabandana said:
H and S are along the same line
in the problem statement. Two points have this habit, so: does it mean something else ? ANd does that have a bearing on the problem ? I think not...
 
The book answer is correct.
The easiest way is to consider the door's motion as the sum of the linear motion of its mass centre and a rotation about that centre.
The linear motion leads to an angular momentum about S. The angular momentum about the mass centre can then be added to this.
Be careful with signs.
bananabandana said:
Why aren't the two the same? Surely the whole system is connected and therefore has the same ##\omega##
Yes.
Edit:
bananabandana said:
by parallel axis theorem:
The parallel axis theorem is for finding the moment of inertia about a point as a centre of rotation. S is not that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bananabandana and BvU
haruspex said:
The book answer is correct.
The easiest way is to consider the door's motion as the sum of the linear motion of its mass centre and a rotation about that centre.
The linear motion leads to an angular momentum about S. The angular momentum about the mass centre can then be added to this.
Be careful with signs.

Yes.
Edit:

The parallel axis theorem is for finding the moment of inertia about a point as a centre of rotation. S is not that.

Ah, of course. No, it's definitely not rotating about S. Thank you. Also realize now that the definition of the intertia tensor only involves motion about the centre of mass, so obviously it doesn't take the angular momentum relative to the origin at $S$ into account.

So then I get this- that the angular momentum about the centre of mass, ##\mathbf{L^{*}}## is given by:

$$ \mathbf{L^{*}} = I\omega \mathbf{\hat{z}} = -\frac{ML^{2}}{12}\mathbf{\hat{z}} $$

(It points down due to right hand rule)
The angular momentum of the centre of mass itself is then ## \mathbf{L_{CM}} ##:

$$ \mathbf{L_{CM}} = \mathbf{r_{CM}} \times \mathbf{p_{CM}} = M \ -\big(s-\frac{L}{2} \big) \mathbf{\hat{i}} \times -v_{CM} \mathbf{\hat{j}} = M\omega\big( s-\frac{L}{2}\big)\frac{L}{2} \mathbf{\hat{k}} $$
Where I've used the fact that the velocity of the centre of mass is the distance from the axis of rotation times the angular velocity ## \mathbf{v_{CM}} = \omega\frac{L}{2}\mathbf{\hat{j}} ##

So,yep:

$$ \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{L^{*}} + \mathbf{L_{CM}} = M\omega L\bigg( \frac{s}{2}-\frac{L}{3} \bigg)\mathbf{\hat{k}} $$Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and BvU
Back
Top