Understanding Angular Momentum States and Clebsh-Gordan Coefficients

spookyfish
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
When we add the angular momenta of two particles, J1 and J2, we get that the resulting total angular momenta is in the range
|J1-J2| < J < J1+J2

but according to the Clebsh-Gordan table some coefficients are zero. Does it mean that not all combinations between |J1-J2| and J1+J2 are possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, they are all possible. The Clebsh-Gordan table also takes the components (the m's) into consideration.
 
ok, but for a given m - some of them might not be possible
 
It's due to symmetry. For example, rotate through 180 degrees, turning z → -z. This reverses the sign of each m value. There's an identity

(j1 -m1 j2 -m2|j3 -m3) = (-1)j1 + j2 + j3 (j1 m1 j2 m2|j3 m3)

So in particular for m1 = m2 = m3 = 0 the Clebsch-Gordan coeffiicent will vanish if j1 + j2 + j3 is odd.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
spookyfish said:
ok, but for a given m - some of them might not be possible

That's correct
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
492
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top