Angular velocity and moment of inertia

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 32K views
kikidoll
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Could you let me know if my answers are correct?

Homework Statement


A light rope is wrapped several times around a large wheel with a radius of 0.400m. The wheel rotates in frictionless bearings about a stationary horizontal axis. The free end of the rope is tied to a suitcase with a mass of 0.15kg. The suitcase is released from rest at a height of 4.00m above the ground. The suitcase has a speed of 3.50 m/s when it reaches the ground.
Calculate:
A) the angular velocity of the wheel when it reaches the ground and
B) the moment of inertia of the wheel

Homework Equations


A) angular velocity (w) = speed/radius
B) mgh = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2Iw2

The Attempt at a Solution



After using these equations I found angular velocity to be 8.75 rad/s and the moment of inertia to be 12.9 kg*m2.

Correct or incorrect? Thanks for you help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kikidoll said:
Could you let me know if my answers are correct?

Homework Statement


A light rope is wrapped several times around a large wheel with a radius of 0.400m. The wheel rotates in frictionless bearings about a stationary horizontal axis. The free end of the rope is tied to a suitcase with a mass of 0.15kg. The suitcase is released from rest at a height of 4.00m above the ground. The suitcase has a speed of 3.50 m/s when it reaches the ground.
Calculate:
A) the angular velocity of the wheel when it reaches the ground and
B) the moment of inertia of the wheel

Homework Equations


A) angular velocity (w) = speed/radius
B) mgh = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2Iw2

The Attempt at a Solution



After using these equations I found angular velocity to be 8.75 rad/s and the moment of inertia to be 12.9 kg*m2.

Correct or incorrect? Thanks for you help.

With ω = v/r then 8.75 looks ok.

But your I looks a little large.

m*g*h is total energy to start with dividing by ω2 where ω2 looks a lot bigger than m*g*h doesn't look right.
 
Thanks for the reply. I also though I was rather large, but with my calculations that's what I ended up getting... strange.
 
kikidoll said:
Thanks for the reply. I also though I was rather large, but with my calculations that's what I ended up getting... strange.

I think you've done something wrong.

Maybe show your numbers and how you got there.
 
A) w = v/r = (3.50)/(0.400) = 8.75 rad/s

B) Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
Ki and Uf = 0

Ui = Kf
mgh = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2Iw2
(15)(9.8)(4) = 1/2 (15)(3.5)2 + 1/2 (I) (8.75)2
588 = 91.9 + 38.3(I)
496.1 = 38.3(I)
I = 12.9 kgm2
 
kikidoll said:
A) w = v/r = (3.50)/(0.400) = 8.75 rad/s

B) Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
Ki and Uf = 0

Ui = Kf
mgh = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2Iw2
(15)(9.8)(4) = 1/2 (15)(3.5)2 + 1/2 (I) (8.75)2
588 = 91.9 + 38.3(I)
496.1 = 38.3(I)
I = 12.9 kgm2

Whoa. SI units please.

m = .15kg
 
Oh my gosh I can't believe I did that *facepalms*

Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it