Angular velocity of a Rod after a Ball hits it.

AI Thread Summary
A horizontal bar with a mass of 3.0 kg and length of 1.0 m rotates about a vertical axis after being struck by a 1.0 kg clay blob traveling at 2.0 m/s, which sticks to the bar. The conservation of angular momentum is applied to find the angular velocity after the collision, as kinetic energy is not conserved in perfectly inelastic collisions. Initial momentum is calculated, and the moment of inertia is determined for the combined system of the bar and clay. The final angular velocity is derived to be 4 rad/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between linear and angular momentum in collision problems.
cocoon
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal bar of mass 3.0 kg and length 1.0 m is free to rotate about a vertical axis through its center. A clay blob of mass 1.0 kg traveling at a velocity of 2.0 m/s in the direction shown collides with the end of the bar and sticks to it. Find the magnitude of the angular velocity of the rod after the collision. The moment of inertia of a bar about a perpendicular axis through the center is \frac{1}{12}*m*l^2.

Homework Equations



Let w be the angular velocity, I be the moment of intertia, r be the radius of the bar, and K_{rot} be the rotational kinetic energy (K is linear kinetic energy). Subscripts c stand for the clay blob and h stand for the horizontal bar.

The Attempt at a Solution



before collision, the system's Kinetic energy is:
K_i = .5 * m_c * v_c^2 = .5 * 1 * 2^2 = 2

no external forces, so
K_i = K_f

after the collision the system's Kinetic energy is
K_f = K_{rot} = .5 * I_h * w_h^2 + .5 * m_c * r^2 * w_c^2
let w = w_h = w_c
K_f = .5 * (I_h + m_c) * w^2 = 2

(m_h * l^2 / 12 + m_c) * w^2 = 4
(3 * 1^2 / 12 + 1) * w^2 = 4
\frac{5}{4} * w^2 = 4
w= \sqrt{\frac{16}{5}} rad/s
is the angular velocity of the rod after the collision.

Is this correct? Is there an easier way?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, it's not correct way to solve the problem.

What conservation law is always true? What conservation law is always true, but has lots of different forms that we can't always account for, particularly in the case of inelastic collisions? Additionally, the way the problem is described, it seems like you should count the ball as being a part of the cylinder once it hits.
 
cocoon said:
no external forces, so
K_i = K_f
The collision is perfectly inelastic (they stick together) so KE is not conserved. (But what is?)

The lack of external forces is not a criterion for KE to be conserved. (But it is for other conserved quantities.)

Also: There are external forces acting--the axis of the rod is fixed.
 
I remember conservation of linear momentum now from earlier this semester. I think I got it now. If not, then please just tell me what to do haha...

let p be linear and L be angular momentum.
before collision, p_c + L_h = m_cv_c + I_hw_h = 1*2 + 0 = 2
and after collision, L_{h+c} = I_{h+c}w_{h+c} = I_hw_{h+c} + m_c\frac{l^2}{4}w_{h+c} = 2
so, (\frac{m_hl^2}{12}+m_c\frac{l^2}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
(\frac{3*1^2}{12}+1*\frac{1}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
w_{h+c} = 4 rad/s

yes?
 
cocoon said:
I remember conservation of linear momentum now from earlier this semester. I think I got it now. If not, then please just tell me what to do haha...
Is linear momentum conserved in this collision? Consider the last line of my previous post.

let p be linear and L be angular momentum.
before collision, p_c + L_h = m_cv_c + I_hw_h = 1*2 + 0 = 2
Linear and angular momentum are two different things (with different units!)--they cannot be added together in a physically meaningful way. Only one of them is conserved in this case.
and after collision, L_{h+c} = I_{h+c}w_{h+c} = I_hw_{h+c} + m_c\frac{l^2}{4}w_{h+c} = 2
so, (\frac{m_hl^2}{12}+m_c\frac{l^2}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
(\frac{3*1^2}{12}+1*\frac{1}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4})w_{h+c} = 2
w_{h+c} = 4 rad/s
Redo this.
 
welp, guess i have to hit the books haha
 
As a hint, you're trying to do too much at once. Maybe you could break the problem down into stages.
 
Back
Top