A Another detection of the 3.5 KeV line

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter phyzguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detection Line
AI Thread Summary
Recent observations in X-ray astronomy have detected a persistent 3.5 KeV line across multiple objects and instruments, suggesting its validity. The line's origin remains unclear, as explanations involving atomic transitions lack convincing evidence, leaving the sterile neutrino decay hypothesis as a plausible interpretation. The debate surrounding the detection continues, with unresolved arguments about instrument noise and the nature of the signal. The latest paper on this topic presents inconclusive results, adding to the ongoing discussion. Future findings will be crucial in determining the significance of the 3.5 KeV line.
phyzguy
Science Advisor
Messages
5,284
Reaction score
2,345
This link is yet another detection of a 3.5 KeV line in long exposure X-ray astronomy observations. It seems that this line is really there, since it has been seen in multiple objects with multiple instruments. I haven't seen any convincing explanations of this line as being due to atomic transitions, and so its interpretation as being due to the decay of ~7KeV sterile neutrinos is still viable. Anybody care to comment?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 3.5 KeV line is still debated [sometimes a little hotly - which admittedly sounds a bit ironic]. The detection seems persistent, albeit not unambiguous. The argument over instrument noise vs a spurious transition line vs a genuine signal remains unresolved. The paper; https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07420, Hitomi constraints on the 3.5 keV line in the Perseus galaxy cluster, appears to be the most recent hat in the ring. Their results were inconclusive. It will be interesting to see the next shoe drop in this matter.
 
  • Like
Likes member 563992
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top