Another Electrostatics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter AKG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the force of repulsion between the northern and southern hemispheres of a charged metal sphere. The electrostatic pressure formula is applied, leading to the calculation of surface charge density and subsequently the force acting on one hemisphere. The derived force is F = Q^2 / (16πε₀R²), which is confirmed as correct. However, there is confusion regarding the interpretation of this force as a repulsion between hemispheres, since the book primarily discusses flat surfaces. The discussion highlights the distinction between forces on spherical conductors and flat surfaces, questioning the terminology used in the problem.
AKG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,559
Reaction score
4
Problem: A metal sphere of radius R carries a total charge Q. What is the force of repulsion between the "northern" hemisphere and the "southern" hemisphere?

My book gives a formula for the electrostatic pressure:

P = \frac{\sigma ^2}{2\epsilon _0}

pushing the surface outwards (and hence pushing the northern hemisphere away from the southern one). I can find \sigma:

\sigma = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}

so I get:

P = \frac{Q^2}{32\pi ^2 \epsilon _0 R^4}

The force acting on one hemisphere will be the pressure times the area of that hemisphere, which is just 2\pi \R^2, so I get:

F = \frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon _0 R^2}

Is this right? The whole problem seems weird to begin with, I'm not sure if the numbers I'm using actually give me the quantity I'm looking for, and not just some other quantity related to the system. So is this right? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks ok. I'm not sure what your confused about.
 
Thanks. I was confused because the book doesn't talk about spherical objects (although it says that the formula for pressure applies to any conductor), but things like flat surfaces. In a flat surface, you would still see this force, but it wouldn't make sense to think of the force in terms of a repulsion from some other conducting surface, since there is none. I wasn't sure why in this case the force was being called the force of repulsion. The force acting on one hemisphere didn't seem to be the force of repulsion due to the other hemisphere, but rather just the same type of force that exists for "open" surfaces when there isn't even any other hemisphere to repel it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top