Another electrostatics question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bitrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the calculation of the electric field above a charged disc, specifically the role of Coulomb's law and the cosine of theta in this context. The Pythagorean theorem is used to determine the distance from the charged ring to a point on the Y-axis, denoted as r. The electric field dE from a charge element points away from point P and has both x and z components. The x components cancel out due to symmetry, while the z components contribute to the net electric field, resulting in E cosθ. This explanation clarifies how the electric field is derived from the charged disc configuration.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
There's no problem as such here, just a bit of confusion I'm having regarding finding the electric field. On the following page, second example, is the equation for finding the electric field above a charged disc http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/elelin.html#c2". I understand how they used the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance from the charged ring to the point on the Y axis to find r, but I'm not understanding why Coulomb's law had to be multiplied by the cosine of theta first?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the electric field dE due to the element of charge shown in the figure is along r and points away from P. This field has two components, one along z and one along x. The x component is canceled by an element of charge diametrically opposed on the other side of the ring. The z component of the diametrically opposed charge is the same dE cosθ. So when you add all the horizontal components you get zero, but when you add all the z-components you get E cosθ.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top