Another Thread About Solutions Manuals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gibby_Canes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a student seeking reliable resources to verify answers while studying advanced topics like Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. The student expresses frustration with the quality of available student solutions manuals and emphasizes a desire to study independently, having progressed two years ahead of their curriculum. They inquire about legal methods to obtain instructor's solutions manuals, explicitly stating a commitment to ethical practices and adherence to academic integrity. The forum guidelines reinforce that requests for solution manuals are not permitted, highlighting that such materials are intended solely for instructors and cautioning against any form of cheating. The conversation underscores the importance of following institutional policies and the limitations in accessing legitimate academic resources.
Gibby_Canes
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I've always looked at the forums here, but never bothered to make an account or post, so this is my first post.

Typically inquiries about finding instructor's solutions manuals are locked for advocating cheating, but most of the student solutions manuals I have are total garbage. I like to study on my own, so I'm two years ahead of my curriculum, and it gets to a point where sometimes I have no idea if the answer I got was right. Or, like when I was studying Lagrangian/Hamiltonian mechanics, sometimes I have no idea how to go about solving a problem, and the more advanced the courses get, the fewer places there are to find help online.

On that note, has anyone figured out a reliable way to attain instructor's solutions manuals? When I work through a textbook I like to do every single problem available, and without something to check my work I'm completely lost.

edit: I should add that I am only interested in legal ways of obtaining them, and do not intend to cheat nor do I advocate it
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The rules clearly state that asking for solution manuals is not allowed here.

Emphasis mine:

We do not support cheating in any form: Do not ask for solution manuals, answers to exams, or instructor's manuals. Every school and instructor has their own policies or honor codes on what constitutes cheating, and it is up to the individual student to adhere to those policies when seeking help here. If you are in doubt as to whether you are permitted to seek help, consider erring on the side of caution and not asking for help.
 
I'm indulging in overriding the the thread lock for a minute, in order to clarify something:

Gibby_Canes said:
I am only interested in legal ways of obtaining them,

Publishers intend instructors' solution manuals to be distributed only to instructors, and we intend to abide by that restriction, regardless of the actual law that may be applicable in whatever country.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top