MHB Answer: Calculate Electric Field Strength at 1mm for a Stationary Electron

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexis Deleon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Alexis Deleon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question: A stationary electron is a point of charge. What is the energy density of U, it's electric field at a radial distance r=1mm?

Know:
1mm=1*10^-3m
u=(1/2)(epsilon naught)(E^2)
E=kq/r^2

I know I have to end up solving for (E)^2, where E=kq/r^2, but how do I determine what charge to use for q?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alexis Deleon said:
Question: A stationary electron is a point of charge. What is the energy density of U, it's electric field at a radial distance r=1mm?

Know:
1mm=1*10^-3m
u=(1/2)(epsilon naught)(E^2)
E=kq/r^2

I know I have to end up solving for (E)^2, where E=kq/r^2, but how do I determine what charge to use for q?

Welcome to MHB Alexis Deleon! :)

The charge q is the negative elementary charge, usually denoted with the symbol $\text{e}$, which is also the first letter of the word electron:
$$q = -1 \text{ e} = -1.602 \cdot 10^{-19} C$$

Note also that:
$$k = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}$$

So:
$$U=\frac 1 2 \epsilon_0 E^2
= \frac 1 2 \epsilon_0 \left( \frac {kq}{r^2}\right)^2
= \frac 1 2 \epsilon_0 \left( \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac {-1\text{ e}}{r^2}\right)^2$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top