Answer Relative Time Travel Question: What Speed to Remain 21 for 10 Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
To remain 21 for 10 years, the physicist must travel at a speed of approximately 0.995 times the speed of light. The concept of proper time (t0) indicates that she experiences only 1 year of aging while 10 years pass on Earth. This discrepancy arises because, at high velocities, time dilation causes her biological clock to run slower compared to Earth’s time. The confusion stems from misunderstanding the relationship between proper time and relative time; her proper time is indeed 1 year, not 10. This illustrates the effects of relativity on time perception between different reference frames.
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A physicist decides she would like to remain 21 for 10 years. What is the minimum constant speed relative to Earth at which she would have to take a rocket trip into outerspace and back in order to achieve this?

Let t=10 and t_{o}=1

t=\frac{t_{o}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

10=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}=\frac{1}{10}

1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}=\frac{1}{100}

\frac{v^2}{c^2}=\frac{99}{100}

v^2=8.91\times10^{16}

v=298496231.1=0.9949874371c

This was the correct answer when I looked up the solutions.

What I do not understand is why the normal time is considered to be 1 year since ten years of proper time has actually past. If I do this problem the other way, a negative answer is obtained. Could someone please explain why this occurs, or have I just not grasped the concepts of what is the proper time and what is the relative time?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Procrastinate said:
What I do not understand is why the normal time is considered to be 1 year since ten years of proper time has actually past.
No, her proper time is only one year, not ten. She only wants to age 1 year (proper time) while 10 years pass on earth.
 
Since t represents the interval between two events as measured in a reference frame moving with speed v with respect to the first reference frame, wouldn't this be 1? This is because the physicist is traveling at high velocity and thus time would be shorter relative to earth.

This doesn't seem to coincide with the values I put as t and t_o.
 
Procrastinate said:
Since t represents the interval between two events as measured in a reference frame moving with speed v with respect to the first reference frame, wouldn't this be 1?
The physicist represents the "clock" (her body) that we are interested in. t is the time between events (her birthdays, perhaps) as seen on earth. t0 is the proper time, which is measured from a frame in which the clock is at rest. t0 is the time that the physicist measures in her rocket ship; t0 is her actual age.
This is because the physicist is traveling at high velocity and thus time would be shorter relative to earth.
The time as measured by her will be shorter. Only 1 year compared to 10 years on earth. Seen from a moving observer (the earth), her biological clock appears to run slow: she only ages 1 year when 10 years have passed on Earth clocks.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top