ANSYS,FLUENT CFD, Turbulent flow

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an assignment involving turbulent airflow through a duct vent with a heat-radiating plate. The primary design constraints include ensuring the entrance length is adequate for fully developed turbulent flow and that the exit length does not disrupt the flow around the plate. Calculations indicate that with a hydraulic diameter of 0.2 m and a Reynolds number of 400,000, the required entrance length is approximately 7.5 m, which raises concerns about its practicality. Participants suggest using the hydraulic diameter for calculations and acknowledge that the relations for entrance length may be imprecise, recommending verification methods like velocity profiles in ANSYS. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding flow development in duct systems to ensure accurate modeling.
sandpants
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have an assignment involving a duct vent and turbulent flow.

Flow enters a duct vent of a certain cross-section, it then reaches another section with a smaller area, at the beginning of which there is a horizontal plate that is radiating heat.

It's a 2D problem.
Fluid is Air, inflow T=20C and velocity is 30m/s

I have 2 primary design constraints:
1)The entrance length must be sufficiently long enough so that the turbulent flow is fully developed by the time it reaches the second section, so as to have the fully developed flow entering the narrower section and going over the hot plate.
2)The exit length needs to be sufficiently long enough so that it doesn't affect the flow around the plate.

My attempts:
1)White M. Frank describes in his book "Fluid Mechanics" that the entrance length to achieve a fully developed turbulent flow is Le=4.4DRe^(1/6), where D is the hydraulic diameter. Somewhere on the internet I saw an expression for hydraulic diameters in duct vents to be... something, but I worked it out and for a thickness of 0.2m it was still 0.2m.
However, @30m/s and density of 1.2kg/m3 the Re is 400,000 and the matching Le for D=0.2 is ~7.5m.
Which is huge. Is there any other way to check if the flow is fully developed?
Would looking for a velocity profile work, even though the flow is turbulent, and how could I do that in ansys?
What other verification methods can be used?

2)I am not sure how the exit geometry can affect the flow around the plate upstream.

Please advise.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The hydraulic diameter Dh of a non-circular duct is given by the formula:

Dh = 4A/P

where A is the cross sectional area and P is the perimeter of the duct. You should be able to find this formula in White, especially when dealing with open-channel flow and Manning's eqn. 'Somewhere on the internet' is incredibly vague and slapdash. IDK why you are using the thickness of anything to determine the Dh.

If you have an Re = 400,000 and a duct with a hydraulic diameter of 0.2 m, then using the relation Le/D = 4.4(Re)1/6 should give an Le of about 7.55 m.
 
SteamKing said:
T

If you have an Re = 400,000 and a duct with a hydraulic diameter of 0.2 m, then using the relation Le/D = 4.4(Re)1/6 should give an Le of about 7.55 m.
It does give me exactly that. And that's for a 0.2m duct width.
My question is whether this is waayyy too long or not.
 
sandpants said:
It does give me exactly that. And that's for a 0.2m duct width.
My question is whether this is waayyy too long or not.

I think you should be using the hydraulic diameter to determine the entrance length, and not necessarily the the duct width,if the duct has a non-circular cross section.

These relations for calculating entrance length are somewhat imprecise. I think that in order to guarantee that the flow in a pipe or duct has gone fully turbulent, a greater entrance length is required, unless some artificial means to stimulate turbulent flow are employed.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top