Antimatter: How and Why It Generates Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allojubrious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Energy
Allojubrious
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have been reading a book written by Leon Lederman and he says something about how much energy antimatter can produce. So knowing that, my question is HOW and WHY does antimatter generate so much energy?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "why" is because all the mass goes away when a particle and it's anti-particle annihilate each other - you get the full E = mc^2 conversion, far more efficiently than other nuclear interactions like fission and fusion. I'm not sure what exactly you mean by the "how", if that doesn't cover it.
 
I was amazed by this too, and even asked he site if energy was a state of matter. The conservation of energy says that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed, just changed. So naturally you can change matter into energy. Einstein figured out that (I'm using random numbers here) if you have a block of wood with a mass of 100, you multiply it by the speed of light, and then square it, so if the speed of light is 10, (100x10)^2=1,000,000. a block of wood that equals 100 units, can be converted into energy that equals a million units. When an object is turned completely into energy, it is called total annihilation, and only happens when matter meets an equal amount of antimatter. The only problem is that antimatter isn't usually found naturally, so we can't make enough for "antimatter propulsion chambers" and antimatter bombs, and all that scifi stuff.
 
Now I get it thanks very much, this actually and truly helped tremendously, thank you.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top