Any concerns over recent choices of NRC Chairpeople

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goldenlemur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choices
AI Thread Summary
Concerns are raised regarding the technical qualifications of NRC Chairpeople Greg Jaczko and Allison Macfarlane, particularly in relation to their backgrounds in nuclear engineering and waste management. While Jaczko holds a PhD in physics, his theoretical focus is questioned, and Macfarlane's geological expertise is seen as limited to specific aspects of nuclear power. The discussion emphasizes the importance of having a chairperson who balances technical knowledge with political savvy, especially given the current social challenges facing the nuclear industry. There is skepticism about Macfarlane's stance on waste disposal, particularly her opposition to the Yucca Mountain facility, which some view as politically motivated rather than scientifically justified. Overall, there is a prevailing sentiment that the appointment of Macfarlane may perpetuate existing biases within the NRC.
Goldenlemur
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am talking about Greg Jaczko and now Allison Macfarlane.

I do not think they are incapable per say, but I question their technical knowledge. Nuclear reactors are highly engineered systems. Jaczko does have a PhD in physics, but it seems to me his dissertation was quite theoretical. Macfarlane is a geologist who does study nuclear waste issues. However, that is only one aspect of nuclear power.

Perhaps I am being baised being a nuclear engineer myself?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Seen that the principal issues for the nuclear industry currently are social rather than technical, I'd be quite open to a savy politician being nominated to the role rather than a technical expert.
 
etudiant said:
Seen that the principal issues for the nuclear industry currently are social rather than technical, I'd be quite open to a savy politician being nominated to the role rather than a technical expert.
I'd prefer someone who a technical expert who is a savvy politician, and who does not have an agenda either way. Regulation should be objective and impartial.

Macfarlane's bio brief - http://esp.gmu.edu/people/facultybios/macfarlane.html

I have to wonder what is her agenda regarding spent fuel and/or HLW disposal in a repository.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atomicinsights.com voices my concerns very well. I have the same objections.

However, the word in Rockville is this a done deal. I hope the rumors are wrong. Any of the other Commissioners would have been a much better choice.
 
Since the appointee has to be confirmed by the senate, I don't think anyone could be confirmed that is pro- or neutral on the subject of Yucca Mountain while Harry Reid is the majority leader. I see a continuation of the 4-1 vote history with the chairperson being the 1.
 
The congressional hearings have convinced me that what I have heard was accurate. They will appoint Dr. Macfarlane. The atomic insights blog seems to agree with me here.

My real curiosity lies in what is contained in the IG report. Rod Adams seems to think it is pretty bad.
 
Jaczko seemed to have a concerted effort to slow the process down; all of his reorganization of paperwork has done is put another layer of cruft in the bureaucratic morass. Not surprising, seeing as he was nominated by an oil man.
Macfarlane will likely be just as obstinate and obtuse, being nominated by a "green energy" messiah.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top