Anyone aware of the Physics of Hydrogen Bonding ? Please suggest resources

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of hydrogen bonding, particularly in the context of experimental research in nanoscience. A graduate student seeks resources and theoretical insights to prepare for an oral exam, specifically looking for explanations related to quantum mechanics, covalent bonding, and Van der Waals forces. Participants provide basic insights into polar bonding and Van der Waals forces, highlighting the role of transitory dipoles and induced charges. The student expresses gratitude for the information and plans to incorporate dipole physics into their preparation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the physics underlying hydrogen bonding and related concepts.
savannas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Anyone aware of the Physics of Hydrogen Bonding ?? Please suggest resources !

Hi everyone,
Am a grad student doing experimental research in an interdisciplinary lab of nanoscience - I am using the concept of hydrogen bonding in some of my experiments. I am planning to present my results to a physics oral exam committe - I am anticipating questions on the 'physics' or atleast the 'theory/model' of hydrogen bonding. I have googled and searched some chemistry textbooks and discussed with my labmates and colleagues. Nobody is aware of the details. I would appreciate if anyone here could recall any quantum/electrodynamics/ any physics concept that might be useful in explaining Hydrogen bonding..
I would also appreciate if anyone could suggest a quantum mechanics book that explains
1. covalent bonding ( u know, sp,sp2,sp3 hybridization)
2. Van der waals forces
in simple way

Thanks a lot
savi
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well I don't think I can explain it past the polar bonding. i assume you want a lot more info than that however :rolleyes:
 


Van der vaal forces are the simplest. Take N2 the electron density around the N2 molecule is not uniform leading to transitory dipoles forming with the molecule. These dipoles take the conventional form of a tiny positive and negative charge on the atom/molecule. This an example of an Van der Vaals force also know as the London dispersion force.

Another example of Van der Vaals forces is when a non polar atom or molecule approaches a permanent dipole. an induced charge results and therefore an attraction.

I hope this helps.
 


Thanks nooma, I am satisfied, there is atleast no theory more complicated than that which is too popular ! :approve:
And, bm0p700f, thanks for your suggestion, I will arm myself with some dipole physics from E&M

Thanks anyways
Savi
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top