Anyone can help with this proof please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MDTulip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality involving complex expressions with variables R, B, γ, and β. Participants suggest simplifying the expressions, possibly by multiplying them out to identify cancellations. There is also a recommendation to use Mathematica's MinValue function to check if the minimum value of the left side is positive under given constraints. One user expresses frustration over the complexity of the expressions but ultimately finds a solution and considers deleting their question. The importance of keeping the question posted for others to learn from is emphasized.
MDTulip
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
((1+R)〖(-4+R^2)〗^2)/(4〖(6+4R+B^2 R-5R^2-R^3+R^4+B(-2+R+R^2))〗^2 )-((1+γ)〖(-4+γ^2)〗^2)/(9〖(6+4γ+β^2 γ-5γ^2-γ^3+γ^4+β(-2+γ+γ^2))〗^2 )>0, where 0 < γ < R < 1, 0 < β < B < 1.

If you can give me some hints about proving it directly, that will be great. Or, Proving it with Mathematica is also ok. For example, I want to use the MinValue function. If the minimum value of the left is positive, then it is proven. But how to write the input with the constraint? So if you are familiar with Mathematica, please help!

I really appreciate your time and help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's an insanely long expression. My best advice would be to multiply everything out and see if you get some kind of cancellation. If that doesn't work, you could try mathematica.
 
Yes it is insanely long. The first part and the second part actually share the same function except that the veriables in the first part are R and B, while in the second part are Beta and r. I cannot just multiply everything because there is a division in both parts. :-(
 
Okay, let me simlify the expression of my question this way:

Let A =(1+R)〖(-4+R^2)〗^2
B =〖(6+4R+B^2 R-5R^2-R^3+R^4+B(R^2+R-2))〗^2
C =(1+γ)〖(-4+γ^2)〗^2)
D =〖(6+4γ+β^2 γ-5γ^2-γ^3+γ^4+β(γ^2+γ-2))〗^2 )
I want to prove that A /4B - C /9D > 0, given 0 < γ < R < 1, 0 < β < B < 1.

Thanks!

gb7nash said:
That's an insanely long expression. My best advice would be to multiply everything out and see if you get some kind of cancellation. If that doesn't work, you could try mathematica.
 
Ok, I have found the solution. Do not know how to delete here. Please help me delete the question. Thanks.
 
Don't delete the question! Why would you do that?

People browse these forums all the time soaking up knowledge. Why would you delete it?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top