Proving Babinet's Principle w/ Superposition & Diffraction - Help Needed

AI Thread Summary
Babinet's Principle asserts that the intensity of light at a point in the shadow region remains unchanged when two complementary objects are placed in the path of a wave. In this scenario, object A is an opaque circle with a hole, while object B is the opposite, allowing light to pass through the hole but blocking it elsewhere. Both objects create identical diffraction patterns, resulting in the same intensity at point P on the screen. The central bright spot is blocked by object A but appears in object B, while surrounding bright rings maintain equal intensity due to the symmetry of the openings. This demonstrates that the overall intensity remains consistent, validating Babinet's Principle through superposition and diffraction.
KillaMarcilla
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Yo, d00dz

I'm kind of stumped on this problem on my homework: "A monochromatic beam of parallel light is incident on a hole of diameter a >> wavelength. Point P lies in the geometrical shadow region on a distant screen. Two obstacles are placed in turn over the hole. A is an opaque circle with a hole in it and B is the "photograhpic negative" of A (a circle with an opaque hole in it) Using superposition concepts, show that the intensity at P is indentical for each of the two diffracting objects A and B (Babinet's principle)"

I'm just clueless as to where to start on this.. I was about to fire up a point-by-point analysis, but this class doesn't really require knowledge of integration, so I don't think that's the right way to go about finding the answer

Can anyone lend a hand?

I'm going to stay up for a while seeing if I can't help anyone else on their homework, and then I'll get up in the morning early, in case any people in other time zones show up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and help me out

Hey d00dz,

Babinet's Principle states that when two complementary objects are placed in the path of a wave, the diffracted waves from each object will cancel each other out and the resulting intensity at any point will be the same as if neither object were present. This principle can be proven using the concept of superposition and diffraction.

To start, we need to understand what is meant by "complementary objects". In this case, object A is an opaque circle with a hole in it, while object B is a circle with an opaque hole in it. This means that when the light passes through object A, it is blocked by the opaque circle but passes through the hole, while in object B, the light is blocked by the hole but passes through the opaque circle.

Now, let's consider the diffraction pattern created by each object. When a wave passes through a small opening, it creates a diffraction pattern on a screen placed in its path. This pattern consists of a central bright spot surrounded by alternating bright and dark rings. The size and intensity of these rings depend on the size and shape of the opening.

Since both object A and B have the same size and shape of the opening, they will create the same diffraction pattern on the screen. However, in object A, the central bright spot will be blocked by the opaque circle, while in object B, the central bright spot will be created by the hole in the opaque circle. This means that the intensity at the central bright spot will be the same for both objects.

Now, let's consider the rest of the diffraction pattern. In object A, the bright rings surrounding the central spot will be created by the light passing through the hole, while in object B, the bright rings will be created by the light passing through the opaque circle. However, since the size and shape of the opening is the same in both objects, the size and intensity of the bright rings will also be the same. This means that the overall intensity at any point in the diffraction pattern will be the same for both objects.

To summarize, since the diffraction patterns created by object A and B are the same, but with opposite intensities, they will cancel each other out and the resulting intensity at any point on the screen will be the same as if neither object were present. This proves Babinet's Principle using the concept of superposition and diffraction.

I hope this helps and good luck with
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
69K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
22K
Replies
0
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
25K
Replies
0
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
28K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top