Application of Circuit laws (KCL and KVL)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to calculate the resistance of a circuit with multiple resistors. The user initially struggles to relate the currents and voltages correctly to find the resistance using the formula R = V/I. Suggestions are made to express the total current in terms of the individual currents identified in the KVL equations. The user acknowledges the oversight and considers the advice to substitute the expressions for the currents to progress towards a solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying circuit laws to solve for resistance.
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the resistance of this combination of resistors

Homework Equations



V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



By using KVL :

V= 3I_{5} = I_{2} = 2I_{4}
I = I_{1} + I_{2}
I_{3} = I_{2} + I_{4}
I_{1} = I_{5} + I_{4}
I = I_{3} + I_{5}Now the final result could be obtained by the simple equation : R =V/I (this is where my progress stagnates)
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 568
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equation relates currents I2, I4, and I5 to the potential across the circuit. Now, if you take your last equation and make substitutions so that you express I in terms of those same currents in the first expression, I think you'll get somewhere.
 
You mean like this :

I = I_{5} + I_{2} + I_{4}

Thus R = V/I

that does not solve the problem ...
 
hms.tech said:
You mean like this :

I = I_{5} + I_{2} + I_{4}

Thus R = V/I

that does not solve the problem ...

But you can substitute your expressions for those currents from your first equation...
 
Oh yes, I overlooked this .
Thanks you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top