Application of the Dot Product (Arfken and Weber)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the angle between two sections of a pipe that runs diagonally down the south and west walls of a building, both at a 45-degree angle to the horizontal. The solution involves using the dot product of vectors to find the angle, which is confirmed to be 120 degrees. Participants emphasize visualizing the problem and applying the parallelogram rule for vector addition. The relationship between the dot product and the angle between vectors is highlighted, allowing for the calculation of the angle based on vector components. Ultimately, the problem is resolved successfully.
rwc0613
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pipe comes diagonally down the south wall of a building, making an angle for 45 degrees with the horizontal. Coming into a corner, the pipe turns and continues diagonally down a west facing wall, still making an angle of 45 degrees with the horizontal. What is the angle between the south wall and west wall sections of the pipe?


Homework Equations


Dot products invariance under the rotation of a coordinate system



The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem is actually visualizing the question. I feel as if it just an application of the parallelogram rule for addition of vectors and then finding the angle. Arfken says the solution is 120 degrees.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
consider the red line as pipe in pic.

can you find the unit vectors along the 2 pipes?
 

Attachments

  • Pipe.png
    Pipe.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 1,353
  • Like
Likes Asif_asadovv
Write Cartesian vectors for both sections of the pipe (you don't have to be particular about their magnitudes as long as the resultants are in the correct 3D directions).

What do you know about the relationship between the dot product of two vectors and the angle between them?
 
Well the relationship between the two vectors in terms of the magnitudes is A dot B=ABcos(theta)=A1B1+A2B2+...+AnBn
 
So, if you can compose two vectors in the directions of the pipes, you can form the dot product directly from its components (A1B1+A2B2+...+AnBn) and also as a product of the vector magnitudes and the cosine of the angle between the vectors. You should be able to solve for the angle, right?
 
Okay thanks a bunch guys! I got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top