Applied mathematics, electrical engineering, or both?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dilemma of choosing between a major in electrical engineering (EE) and applied mathematics, with considerations for future master's programs in either field. The participant expresses concern about the implications of their choice on career prospects and personal interests, particularly regarding the mathematical rigor involved in EE. Responses emphasize that a strong foundation in mathematics enhances engineering skills and that both disciplines offer valuable career paths, with engineering likely providing more immediate job opportunities. There is also a suggestion to consider personal interests and long-term industry trends when making the decision. Ultimately, both paths can lead to fulfilling careers, and strong math skills are beneficial in either field.
Tim92G
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm starting my second year at school, and knowing that I will have to declare my major soon I'm torn between the possible choices. Officially, I am in the engineering program but I took a lot of extra credits in math last year since it interests me so doing the double major program in engineering-applied mathematics would not be difficult. On the other hand, I can major only in electrical engineering and have the security of being able to pursue an m.s. in applied math if I continue with the advanced math electives. Or, I could major in applied mathematics with enough engineering electives to go for the M.S. in engineering... The problem is just that I'm very overwhelmed by all this at this point in my life and I still don't know which field will suit my interests, and I'm afraid that if I change studies after my B.S. it will hurt me. The reason I've been taking the electrical engineering electives is because they seem to utilize more of the advanced mathematics (however at this level my perception could be wrong).

Ultimately, this comes down to deciding whether I want to do the masters program in e.e. or math, but I don't know enough about the programs and what they encompass to decide which one interests me. Nor do I personally know anyone that could tell me.

So my question is basically what are the differences/similarities between the focuses of the two disciplines at the graduate level and beyond, and what would the ideal path to each one be?

Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope there are some students who have gone through the same experience that could offer suggestions
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sorry i see that i should have posted this in academic guidance this is my first time to this forum
 
I would go with EE and enroll in extra math class. To be a good EE, you have to have more math than it is required. Normal BSEE require Cal I II III and ODE class. That is nowhere close. I studied PDE on my own, I think you can use Linear Algebra, PDE at the minimum, then consider Numerical Ana., Complex Ana. I think this will bring you quite far in you math major that you can change direction quite easy. Particular if you want to pursue electromagnetics, you are going to need all the math above plus Green Function more advanced than even in PDE. PDE barely touch the Green Function. A little Probability and Statistic will help in modulation and communication field.

Bottom line, they are not mutually exclusive. Strong math make you a better engineer. Math itself don't have a whole lot of job opportunity, but it would be so easy for you to change career if you have a strong math background. Getting into Physics is a natural progression. Math is the language of science, all advanced physics and electronics are written in language of math.
 
From a personal (your person) point of view all the options you present are good.

I would make some observations however.

I don't know how it works where you live but in the UK you would need a formal engineering qualification to practice as an engineer at anything other than junior level. So plan to get one under your belt at some stage.

Don't believe that EE maths is more advanced than for other disciplines, it is just not true.

What is true is that at the present state of knowledge electrical networks lend themselves more easily to available analytical techniques than say gas pipeline networks which can only be handled by numerical techniques. As an applied mathematician I have done both.

Hope this helps

go well
 
purely practical suggestion - look ahead twenty years.

what do you like to do?
are you a hands-on tinkerer who is always building things?

if so, engineering will get you a job close to machinery which imho will be a real marketable skill-set in next fifty years as world re-industrializes with newer technology.

if you prefer analytical office work it probably doesn't matter which way you go.
but there's always need in industry for engineers...especially ones with high math skills.

I envy you, young man!

old ijm
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top