Programs Apply for a PhD in theoretical condensed matter physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in finding suitable PhD positions in theoretical formulations of general relativity and related fields. Despite extensive searches, few research groups align with the individual's interests, leading to frustration over limited opportunities. The individual is considering applying for a PhD position in theoretical condensed matter physics, which, while not their primary interest, shares analytical components with their background. Concerns are raised about the potential long-term implications of pursuing a PhD in a different field, particularly regarding future opportunities in gravity and quantum field theory. The conversation highlights the disparity in research funding and community size between gravity and condensed matter physics.
EnigmaticField
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
I did research on theoretical formulations in general relativity during my MSc studies. I look forward to pursuing PhD and have searched many universities and some research institutes for suitable research themes, but haven't found many research groups undertaking research consistent with my research interest.

I first searched for groups in themes closely related to my MSc research, namely theoretical formulations in general relativity and other closely related classical gravity theories, but I didn't have much harvest. So I tried to broaden the horizon of my knowledge in order to extend the scope of potential themes for my PhD research. In the beginning, the themes I extended to were still confined to the ones in classical gravity theory and I did find some groups in themes interesting me. However, I still didn't find an adequately big number of groups in these themes, and the principal investigators in these groups don't have PhD positions to offer or don't reply me after I contact them. Then I continued extending the scope of potential themes to quantum gravity theory and quantum field theory and have applied for several PhD programs in these fields which called for applications. Nonetheless, I still only find a small number of PhD programs of this kind. I find most research groups with research themes consisting with my research interest seem to have never had open PhD position announcement at least during the period from when I found them to now. One or two groups among them even definitely state in their website that they have not had further open PhD positions since their latest PhD student graduated in 2012. Thus I am worried that I can't further find adequately many research groups in my research interest to apply for PhD positions.

Recently I saw an open PhD position announcement in a group of theoretical condensed matter physics, with the research theme of the position being developing nonperturbative methods for in- and out-of-equilibrium systems in low dimensions, particularly quantum magnetism, cold atoms and nanoscale solid-state systems, with the focus on integrable models. I find this theme seems to interest me for it shares some feature of those interesting themes in gravity theory and quantum field theory in that it has considerable contents of interesting analytical components, some of which may even employ techniques I have learned from gravity theory and quantum field theory. Therefore I am considering whether to apply for this position and then further apply for other open positions in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I see them. The reason countering my application is that I am still far more interested in gravity theory and quantum field theory than theoretical condensed matter physics and hope to continue to work on them after completing my PhD studies though I may want to digress occasionally to research on interesting topics in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I find them. In addition, I may consider applying for temporary positions in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I can't quickly get a position in gravity theory and quantum field theory. However, I consider PhD fields should be treated as a credential rather than a temporary expedient job, so if I get a PhD in theoretical condensed matter physics, I may not be able to be accepted to a position in gravity theory and quantum field theory again. In contrast, the reason prompting my application is that having a position in a field in which I have some real interest is better than either having no position or getting a position in a field not much of my interest but just for earning money; I have not found many research groups in gravity theory and quantum field theory with research themes in my research interest despite much search and am not sure how many further I can find. So what are your opinions as to whether I should apply for this position with upcoming deadline and further apply for other positions in theoretical condensed matter physics?

P.S. The universities and research institutes where I search for suitable research groups are mainly in Europe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EnigmaticField said:
I did research on theoretical formulations in general relativity during my MSc studies. I look forward to pursuing PhD and have searched many universities and some research institutes for suitable research themes, but haven't found many research groups undertaking research consistent with my research interest.

I first searched for groups in themes closely related to my MSc research, namely theoretical formulations in general relativity and other closely related classical gravity theories, but I didn't have much harvest. So I tried to broaden the horizon of my knowledge in order to extend the scope of potential themes for my PhD research. In the beginning, the themes I extended to were still confined to the ones in classical gravity theory and I did find some groups in themes interesting me. However, I still didn't find an adequately big number of groups in these themes, and the principal investigators in these groups don't have PhD positions to offer or don't reply me after I contact them. Then I continued extending the scope of potential themes to quantum gravity theory and quantum field theory and have applied for several PhD programs in these fields which called for applications. Nonetheless, I still only find a small number of PhD programs of this kind. I find most research groups with research themes consisting with my research interest seem to have never had open PhD position announcement at least during the period from when I found them to now. One or two groups among them even definitely state in their website that they have not had further open PhD positions since their latest PhD student graduated in 2012. Thus I am worried that I can't further find adequately many research groups in my research interest to apply for PhD positions.

Recently I saw an open PhD position announcement in a group of theoretical condensed matter physics, with the research theme of the position being developing nonperturbative methods for in- and out-of-equilibrium systems in low dimensions, particularly quantum magnetism, cold atoms and nanoscale solid-state systems, with the focus on integrable models. I find this theme seems to interest me for it shares some feature of those interesting themes in gravity theory and quantum field theory in that it has considerable contents of interesting analytical components, some of which may even employ techniques I have learned from gravity theory and quantum field theory. Therefore I am considering whether to apply for this position and then further apply for other open positions in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I see them. The reason countering my application is that I am still far more interested in gravity theory and quantum field theory than theoretical condensed matter physics and hope to continue to work on them after completing my PhD studies though I may want to digress occasionally to research on interesting topics in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I find them. In addition, I may consider applying for temporary positions in theoretical condensed matter physics in case I can't quickly get a position in gravity theory and quantum field theory. However, I consider PhD fields should be treated as a credential rather than a temporary expedient job, so if I get a PhD in theoretical condensed matter physics, I may not be able to be accepted to a position in gravity theory and quantum field theory again. In contrast, the reason prompting my application is that having a position in a field in which I have some real interest is better than either having no position or getting a position in a field not much of my interest but just for earning money; I have not found many research groups in gravity theory and quantum field theory with research themes in my research interest despite much search and am not sure how many further I can find. So what are your opinions as to whether I should apply for this position with upcoming deadline and further apply for other positions in theoretical condensed matter physics?

P.S. The universities and research institutes where I search for suitable research groups are mainly in Europe.

I'm in a similar situation as yours, I'd also like to hear some advice from people in this forum.
 
The most obvious answer is probably that a very small community does research on gravity whereas a very large one researches condensed matter. Condensed matter gets the funding. Even though most of it goes to the experimentalists, theoreticians also get their fair share. I know, gravity is sexy. But it is also relatively useless and there's more competition.
 
  • Like
Likes Hypercube
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Back
Top