Schools Applying for grad school What to do about a not-so-good research experience?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's experience with a research project that did not go well due to poor supervision, resulting in a B+ grade. The student is concerned about how this experience will affect their graduate school applications, particularly regarding whether to mention it or seek a letter of recommendation from the supervising professor. Responses suggest that the student should focus on their two other successful research experiences and avoid highlighting the negative aspects of the poor project. It's advised to briefly describe the research without negativity and to not draw attention to the less favorable experience in their application. Overall, the consensus is to emphasize positive experiences while minimizing the impact of the less successful project.
McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I worked for a professor as a visiting student at XYZ university this spring on a research project. He delegated the supervision to one of his assistants who didn't really seem to care about the project. I should have worked with more focus instead of simply doing what he wanted me to. Regardless of whose fault it was, it went pretty poorly and although I managed to get a few results before the end, it wasn't very impressive at all. This professor is a pretty big shot and to be honest, I did learn quite a few things from it and this is my only foray into experimental work. The professor and I didn't interact much so his opinion of me is based entirely on his assistant's appraisal and that isn't great news for me. It was for credit and I ended up with a B+ and I left it at that.

Now, I want to apply to grad schools next year so what should I do about this? I am applying to a bunch of a schools including XYZ university. Should I mention what happened or just not say anything about it? And should I even bother with an LOR from him or will it hurt more than help? I have two other undergrad research experiences and those went well. I blew a good opportunity, I know that. But it's too late to change it so what can I do now?

Thank you, and Merry Christams!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One of my professors told me that when they are looking for research experience, it's more a matter of checking a box ("applicant x did research, check") than a matter of close examination. No research is a red flag. Publications aren't necessarily highly regarded, the notion is that generally a student just got swept along for the ride and their name ended up buried in the author list.

So I feel like with your two opportunities you can get that box checked, and that's what counts, no need for the third guy. But I'm a bit of an amateur so we'll see what more experienced folks have to say...
 
McLaren Rulez said:
Should I mention what happened or just not say anything about it?

What would you say? Would you say what you said in your thread here? In that case, I think it would be better not to say anything at all. People may see you as somebody who is making up excuses and who likes to blame other people (regardless of what you are saying is true). This is not the impression you will want to give.

If you don't think you'll get a good letter of recommendation of the professor, then don't ask one of him.
 
Thank you both for the replies.

Micromass, I was wondering whether it's worth mentioning that I tried my hand at research and it didn't go well. I'll word it well and won't let it come across as if I'm blaming someone else.

The question is, is it better to come clean and admit that I had one poor experience and I learned from my mistakes and moved on or if I should just not talk about it at all? It will show up on my transcript as an Independent Study course so will it not raise a red flag if I don't mention it at all?
 
I am a little confused. From your comments, I count 3 undergrad research experiences. That's great. Surely one of those will supply a good LOR. You will then briefly describe the other 2 in the research sections of your statement and resume. So I don't see the problem.

I would say only briefly describe what research you did and the results you obtained (stick to the science), but avoid any negativity. Don't go into how busy you were that semester or how that type of research didn't capture your interests (these should now become your real reasons, btw). You're moving to the next level where even more obfuscation is required. Good luck!
 
Thank you for your advice!

I was just worried that not doing so well in a research project (the grade is a B+ which is low for these courses) might count against me. I wasn't sure whether putting it in my statement and drawing attention to it was a good idea or not.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top