Understanding Kirchoff's Law and Solving Circuit Problems

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the current I3 in a circuit with a voltage source of 3.7V, it's essential to apply Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) correctly. The equation used, 0.4R2 - 3.7 - 200I3 = 0, led to an incorrect result due to misinterpreting the direction of current flow. When analyzing the circuit, if the current flows down through R3, it results in a potential rise when moving clockwise, which must be accounted for in the calculations. Properly considering the direction of currents will help avoid mistakes in future analyses. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving circuit problems.
Pochen Liu
Messages
52
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2018-11-5_12-29-56.png

How do I calculate the current I3?

Homework Equations


I know that I1 = I2 + I3
and that I2 = 0.4

The Attempt at a Solution


So we have a voltage source of 3.7V I would've thought that the equation for a clockwise circuit be
0.4R2 - 3.7 - 200I3 = 0 which gives me an answer of -0.0183 when it should be 0.0187

How am I using the law wrong and how can I prevent doing so in the future?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-5_12-29-56.png
    upload_2018-11-5_12-29-56.png
    9.2 KB · Views: 545
Physics news on Phys.org
Pochen Liu said:
So we have a voltage source of 3.7V I would've thought that the equation for a clockwise circuit be
0.4R2 - 3.7 - 200I3 = 0 which gives me an answer of -0.0183 when it should be 0.0187

How am I using the law wrong and how can I prevent doing so in the future?
You need to pay attention to the direction of the currents as you do your "KVL walk" around the circuit. For example, ##I_3## is flowing down through ##R_3##, so as you "walk over" ##R_3## going clockwise around the circuit you'll see a rise in potential.
 
gneill said:
You need to pay attention to the direction of the currents as you do your "KVL walk" around the circuit. For example, ##I_3## is flowing down through ##R_3##, so as you "walk over" ##R_3## going clockwise around the circuit you'll see a rise in potential.
Is this because if I go 'walk over' instead of using the voltage it will add? since it's coming from the other direction, therefore I need to change it's mathematical sign around right?
 
Pochen Liu said:
Is this because if I go 'walk over' instead of using the voltage it will add? since it's coming from the other direction, therefore I need to change it's mathematical sign around right?
Right, you need to account for the current directions. If you "walk" in the same direction of the current you'll see a potential drop across the resistor. If you "walk" against the direction of the current you'll see a potential rise.
 
  • Like
Likes Pochen Liu
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top