Approximating Magnetic Field for Spinning Disk with Large Distance from Center

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the magnetic field equation for a spinning disk, specifically showing that B approximates to μ₀/(2π) * μ/x³ when x is much greater than R. Participants discuss the importance of considering terms in the denominator that may seem small but are significant in the approximation process. The use of the binomial series for approximating the square root in the denominator is highlighted as a key mathematical technique. One participant expresses uncertainty about applying the binomial series, indicating a need for clarification on substituting and simplifying terms. The conversation emphasizes the relevance of careful mathematical manipulation in deriving the correct approximation for the magnetic field.
hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I am asked to show that

B = \frac{\mu_0Q\omega}{2\pi R^2}[\frac{R^2+2x^2}{(R^2+x^2)^{1/2}}-2x]

simplifies to this

B \approx \frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{x^3}

if x>>R

where \mu is the magnetic dipole moment for a disk spinning with angular velocity \omega, which is

\mu = \frac{Q\omega R^2}{4}

Homework Equations


GYza5r.png
[/B]


3. The Attempt at a Solution


I ignored the R^2 in the denominator since it has become a small quantity. Then I have (R^2+2x^2)/(sqrt(x^2)) -2x
From this I get R^2/x but this equation lacks the third degree of the x.
The book has a solution for this problem as I have posted but I didn't understand it either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hitemup said:
I ignored the R^2 in the denominator since it has become a small quantity.
Small, but not irrelevant - you subtract two "large" numbers with a small difference from each other, so the first order of the difference is relevant. See the second line in (2), where the (inverse) denominator gets expanded up to second order (the part with "...").
 
  • Like
Likes hitemup
  • Like
Likes hitemup
NascentOxygen said:
It looks like they are using the first few terms of the Binomial Series to approximate (a + x)

Have you come across the binomial series in your maths study? See the bottom half of this page: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/BinomialSeries.aspx
I learned it in high school and it was only for integers. This is something new but I'll try to handle it, thank you. What exactly has to be done after writing the series expansion?
 
Last edited:
You substitute the first few terms of the infinite series (writing it in the numerator) in place of the square-root expression in the denominator, then multiply and simplify.
 
  • Like
Likes hitemup
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top