Approximation involving an exponential function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the approximation of the expression exp[gbH/(2kT)] when gbH/2 is much less than 1. The approximation simplifies to 1 + gbH/(2kT) using the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near zero. Participants clarify that while the series can be truncated, it cannot be equated to 1 without losing significant parameters. The approximation can also be visualized by comparing the exponential curve to its tangent line at zero. This understanding aids in grasping the derivation of certain laws in physics.
mccoy1
Messages
116
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was following a derivation of some laws and I didn't get how they approximate some portion of the expression. That portion/part is exp[gbH/(2kT)]. The book says gbH/2 <<1 and therefore exp[gbH/(2kT)] = 1+gbH/(2kT).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I agree with the value 1, but where did gbH/(2kT) come from? Please help. My understanding is that if gbH/2 is way less than 1, then e.g exp[1.0*10^-15/KT)] = 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it's the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near 0

exp(x) = 1 + x + (x^2)/2 + (x^3)/6 + ...

You can cut the series at any term you would like, however you can't equal it to 1 because there will be no parameter left to give values to...
 
You can also get this approximation by replacing the curving graph by a tangent line.
 
atomthick said:
Because it's the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near 0

exp(x) = 1 + x + (x^2)/2 + (x^3)/6 + ...

You can cut the series at any term you would like, however you can't equal it to 1 because there will be no parameter left to give values to...

Haa, thank you very much. That didn't pop in my head. Thanks a lot.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can also get this approximation by replacing the curving graph by a tangent line.

Thanks for that.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top