Approximation involving an exponential function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the approximation of the expression exp[gbH/(2kT)] when gbH/2 is much less than 1. The approximation simplifies to 1 + gbH/(2kT) using the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near zero. Participants clarify that while the series can be truncated, it cannot be equated to 1 without losing significant parameters. The approximation can also be visualized by comparing the exponential curve to its tangent line at zero. This understanding aids in grasping the derivation of certain laws in physics.
mccoy1
Messages
116
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was following a derivation of some laws and I didn't get how they approximate some portion of the expression. That portion/part is exp[gbH/(2kT)]. The book says gbH/2 <<1 and therefore exp[gbH/(2kT)] = 1+gbH/(2kT).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I agree with the value 1, but where did gbH/(2kT) come from? Please help. My understanding is that if gbH/2 is way less than 1, then e.g exp[1.0*10^-15/KT)] = 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it's the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near 0

exp(x) = 1 + x + (x^2)/2 + (x^3)/6 + ...

You can cut the series at any term you would like, however you can't equal it to 1 because there will be no parameter left to give values to...
 
You can also get this approximation by replacing the curving graph by a tangent line.
 
atomthick said:
Because it's the Taylor expansion of exp(x) near 0

exp(x) = 1 + x + (x^2)/2 + (x^3)/6 + ...

You can cut the series at any term you would like, however you can't equal it to 1 because there will be no parameter left to give values to...

Haa, thank you very much. That didn't pop in my head. Thanks a lot.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can also get this approximation by replacing the curving graph by a tangent line.

Thanks for that.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top