Approximations used in solving for the electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a uniformly charged rod at a point far away from it. The initial attempt suggests that if the distance x is much greater than the rod length L, the electric field should approach zero. However, the correct approach involves recognizing that the electric field can be approximated as E = (λL/4πεx²), which aligns with the behavior of a point charge. The key takeaway is that while the L/x term is small, it still contributes to the electric field calculation at large distances. Understanding these approximations is essential for accurately determining the electric field in such scenarios.
AeroKaro
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a rod of length L oriented on the z-axis so that the bottom end is at z= - L/2 and the top end if at z = L/2. Furthermore, the rod is uniformly charged with charge density 'λ'. Now we are interested in finding the electric field at a point x away from the midpoint of the rod. If this distance is very far away so that x>>L. What is the electric field at x?

Homework Equations


E = (λ/4πεx)*(L/√(x_squared + (L_squared/4))), in the x hat direction.
(Sorry for the mess, I'm new here and am not familiar with Latex or any other methods of typing mathematical equations).

The Attempt at a Solution


Now my intuition tells me that if x>>L, then x/L>>1 or L/x must equal about 0. I see an L/x term in my equation and if I apply the latter approximation my electric field becomes zero. If I am very, very far away from the charged rod, I shouldn't feel its effects. However, another solution I see is to factor out the x_squared from the denominator to get E = (λ/4πεx_squared)*(L/√(1 + (L_squared/4x_squared))) THEN apply the approximation to get rid of the L_squared/4x_squared term and arrive at a final answer of E = λL/4πεx_squared, in the x hat direction. What is wrong with my initial attempt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Nothing wrong with your initial shot: the L/x factor stays in there (after all you are looking at te x-dependence) and you get $$|E| = {\lambda L\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0 x^2} = {1\over 4 \pi\varepsilon_0} \, {Q\over x^2} $$ just like from a simple charge at the origin -- and just like your second approach.

By the way: Hello Karo, :welcome: (in case you weren't welcomed yet).

##\LaTeX## is fun. Check out the intros. Start with ##\#\# ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##\#\# ## to get ## a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ##.
Proceed with right-mouse click over an equation and "Show math as ##\TeX## commands"
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top