Arbitrary function of a matrix - power-series representation

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I am trying to evaluate exp(i*f(A)), where A is a matrix whose eigenvalues are known and real.

Homework Equations


You can expand functions of a matrix in a power-series. I think that's the way to get started on this problem. I foresee the exponential of a power-series expansion of f(A) suddenly becoming a product of exponentials of a matrix, which, themselves, are power-series. It sounds ugly, but perhaps some pleasant collapse will happen.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, let's try finding power-series expansion of f(A):
f(A) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{n \to \infty } {\frac{{{f^{(n)}}(0)}}{{n!}}{A^n}} = {\rm{oh dear}}...{\rm{unaware of derivatives of f at 0}}{\rm{.}}

Hmmm...maybe my idea above is not so great.

I think I am thwarted by the arbitrariness of the function "f(A)". Prior experience suggests arbitrariness is nothing to be afraid of...just an opportunity for higher generality...which is neato.

When you, dear reader, peruse this cry for help, do any suggestions come to your mind for a starting point to evaluating exp(i*f(A))? I just can't seem to bring "A" outside of "f" in order to take advantage of the fact that we know its eigenvalues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know anything about f?

otherwise I would just expand the exponential as
e^{i f(A)} = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(A))^k}{k!}
 
Last edited:
not sure this helps but playing with stuff

start by making the assumption A is diagonalisable - is it...? may lead to somthing interesting...

then there exists some S such that
S^{-1}AS = \lambda
where lambda is diagonal, with main entries the eigenvalues of A

then
f(A) <br /> = f(S \lambda S^{-1}) <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda S^{-1})^n}} <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda^n S^{-1})}} <br /> = S \left( \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{( \lambda^n )}} \right)S^{-1}<br /> = Sf(\lambda)S^{-1}
 
Last edited:
then applying same idea in the exponential
e^{i f(A)} = e^{i Sf(\lambda)S^{-1} }<br /> = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(i S f(\lambda)S^{-1} )^k}{k!}<br /> = S \left( \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(\lambda))^k}{k!} \right) S^{-1}<br /> = S e^{i f(\lambda)}S^{-1}

and I'm not sure whether that's helpful...
 
Last edited:
then you could also note for a diagonal matrix lambda
f(\lambda) = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> f(\lambda_1) &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; f(\lambda_2) &amp; ... \\<br /> ... &amp; ... &amp; ... \end{pmatrix}

which should be apparent from post #3
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top