Arcing - What affects size of arc when switch is opened?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazyhorse2882
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc Switch
AI Thread Summary
The size of an electrical arc when a switch is opened is influenced by the voltage, current, and inductance in the circuit. Arcing occurs when there is a load or resistance present, as an open circuit without resistance does not generate an arc. When a main breaker is closed while individual circuits are open, there is voltage but no current, resulting in no arcing. Medium voltage switches are categorized into "no load disconnect" and "load disconnect," with interlocking mechanisms to prevent operation under load conditions. Understanding these principles is essential for safe electrical system design and operation.
Crazyhorse2882
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
When an electrical circuit is opened or closed there is an arc between the terminals/buss that the switch or breaker is connecting or disconnecting and the arc is greater depending on the amount of voltage. My question is, is the arc greater when there is a resistance/load on the circuit? I'm guessing yes, but what is the effect and how could you calculate it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have to consider the whole circuit to determine that.
In general, inductances (especially coils), large switching voltages and large currents will increase the amount of arcing you get.
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
... is the arc greater when there is a resistance/load on the circuit? ...

Without a resistance/load, you wouldn't have a circuit in the first place, and therefore wouldn't have an arc at all.
 
So then if a main breaker was closed outside of a building feeding equipment inside the building but their individual circuits were open then there would be no arc as that breaker closed? There would be voltage but no current and my understanding is that it will arc
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
So then if a main breaker was closed outside of a building feeding equipment inside the building but their individual circuits were open then there would be no arc as that breaker closed?
That is correct.
There would be voltage but no current and my understanding is that it will arc
No, it will not arc.
 
To emphasize this point - for medium voltage switches - there are two general classes "no load disconnect" and "load disconnect" - The no load types are ideally interlocked ( often literally with locks and keys - ref Kirk Key) - with the load side circuit breaker. The Load side circuit breaker must be open - to get the key that allows the line side "no load" switch to be operated ( opened or closed).
TO feed a transformer a MV switch used on the primary is technically a load break switch (it will have an arc chute & arcing contacts- separate form the main contacts) , but only rated to interrupt the magnetizing current of the transformer it feeds - so you still see the interlocking scheme.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top