Are Atoms Real or Just a Myth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShadowChaotic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Fiction
AI Thread Summary
Atoms are a scientifically proven fact, with key evidence provided by Albert Einstein's 1905 paper on Brownian Motion, which demonstrated their existence. The Rutherford scattering experiment further confirmed that atoms have a positively charged nucleus, solidifying their accepted structure. Various online resources, including simulations of these experiments, can aid in understanding atomic theory and provide visual proof of atoms. These tools are particularly useful for eighth-grade assignments aimed at exploring the existence of atoms. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of scientific experiments and resources in proving atomic existence.
ShadowChaotic
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm doing an assignment for grade 8 science in which I have to prove whether or not atoms are fact or fiction. I was just wondering if anyone would be able to give me a few tips to help me out with this. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, atoms are fact! I'm not sure what kind of "proof" would be appropriate to an eighth grade paper but you might want to look at "Brownian Motion". I went to google.com, entered "Brownian Motion" and got a number of links, including this one:
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/more_stuff/Applets/brownian/brownian.html

It was Albert Einstein's (heard of him?!) 1905 paper on Brownian Motion that gave the first convincing proof of the existence of atoms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ShadowChaotic said:
I'm doing an assignment for grade 8 science in which I have to prove whether or not atoms are fact or fiction. I was just wondering if anyone would be able to give me a few tips to help me out with this. :smile:
In addition to the previous recommendation, you might also want to look up the Rutherford scattering experiment. This experiment not only confirmed the existence of atoms (which was already generally accepted), it confirmed that atoms have the internal structure of a heavy positively charged nucleus concentrated in a small volume compared to the size of an atom.

There is a nice lttle simulation of the experiment here

http://www.waowen.screaming.net/revision/nuclear/rsanim.htm

You can adjust the starting position of the alpha particle projectile (click and drag) before firing, and see the tracks created as it is scattered by the nucleus. You can also adjust the energy of the particle, which changes its speed.
 
A very interesting project.

I thought what your teacher wants is a statement who prove the atom existence and how. The above resources is useful.
 
Nice links, guys! Here's one more, just as a starting point on the subject of http://stm2.nrl.navy.mil/how-afm/how-afm.html , which not only provides images of atoms, but wouldn't even be possible if they didn't exist. There are other sites that offer varying levels of explanation and pictures.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks

thanks guys, that helps a lot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top