Are Cosmic Rays Particles or Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
Cosmic rays are primarily composed of particles such as protons and atomic nuclei, but they also include high-energy gamma rays, which can be classified as radiation. Historically, cosmic rays were considered part of the electromagnetic spectrum, as noted in various encyclopedias and works by physicists like Richard Feynman. However, there has been some confusion over their classification, as they exhibit characteristics of both particles and radiation. The distinction is further complicated by the fact that cosmic rays can originate from beyond the Milky Way. Ultimately, cosmic rays can be understood as both particles and radiation, depending on the context.
RAD4921
Messages
346
Reaction score
1
In the 1969 edition of the World Book Encylopedia it shows that cosmic rays are considered part of the electromagnetic spectrum. In later editions the diagram doesn't show cosmic rays is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. In Capras famous book "The Tao of Physics, he also shows that cosmic rays are part of the EM-S. In other articles it states that cosmic rays were found to be atomic nuclei (in 1928) traveling close to the speed of light. I looked in a highly technical astronomy books and from what little I could decipher from the techno garble that cosmic rays fall into a gray area as far as whether they are radiation or particles. Richard Feynman once included cosmic rays as part of the EM-S in a video tape I saw of him. What gives? Are cosmic rays particles or radiation or possible both?
Thanks, RAD
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Both. Cosmic rays - particles - are protons and nuclei (e.g. He4); also electrons and positrons ... the term is usually shorthand for 'galactic cosmic rays', not 'solar cosmic rays'. Despite the former's name, some CRs clearly come from well beyond the Milky Way.

High energy gammas are also 'cosmic rays', though they can be distinguished from particles by various techniques, hence VHE cosmic ray (gamma) 'telescopes' such as CANGAROO, HESSI, VERITAS. http://www.srl.caltech.edu/personnel/dick/cos_encyc.html gives a brief overview of the particle CRs; http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/cr_new.html is a brief summary of UHEs; CANGAROO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To: Nereid

Thank you for taking the time and care in answering my question. Now I know why I was confused about this. RAD:)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top