Are E and B Always Orthogonal in Electromagnetic Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kidphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal
Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



E . B =0

Homework Equations



∇xE=B

The Attempt at a Solution



I know AxB=C implies both A and B are orthogonal to C but does the same thing ring true for the Del cross something? In any case, is there a nice simple proof for the problem stated? This is not HW by the way but seems to be a bit homeworish
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're going to have to be way more detailed. I'm assuming E and B are the electric and magnetic field respectively. If so, then in general they are not orthogonal. For special solutions to Maxwell's equations they can be orthogonal, such as for vacuum radiation fields, but it is certainly not true in full generality.
 
WannabeNewton said:
You're going to have to be way more detailed. I'm assuming ##E## and ##B## are the electric and magnetic field respectively. If so, then in general they are not orthogonal. For special solutions to Maxwell's equations they can be orthogonal, such as for vacuum radiation fields, but it is certainly not true in full generality.

ah, for it to be light must they be orthogonal?
 
Have you seen vacuum plane wave solutions to Maxwell's equations before?
 
WannabeNewton said:
Have you seen vacuum plane wave solutions to Maxwell's equations before?

yes it says this must be the case. For light. I guess this means E.B=0 for light but it is not necessary for them to be orthogonal, but this does not mean it is light if the first condition is not met?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top